Computing derivatives with differential quotients
Exrecises: derivative and differentiability
Exercise (Derivative of a product function)
Let
defined by
Determine
.
Solution (Derivative of a product function)
There is
For
we have used that
is continuous as a product of the continuous functions
for
.
Exercise (Derivative of a function with case distinction)
Check whether the following functions are differentiable at
.


Solution (Criterion for non-differentiability of a general function at zero)
There is
since
So
does not exist.
How to get to the proof? (Determining limits with the differential quotient)
Since
in
is differentiable, there is
and
In addition, from the exercises within the article "derivatives", we know that
The idea is to transform the limits so that we can calculate them using the differential quotient.
Solution (Determining limits with the differential quotient)
Part 1: Because
there is also
. So
Part 2: With
and
there is also
and
. Hence
Part 3: Here we need the "original" differential quotient
:
Hint: Show first that
Solution (Implication of differentiability)
There is
Since now the product of a bounded sequence and a null sequence converges to zero, there is with the calculation rules for sequences
Concerning the additional question: The converse is false. Let us consider the following function, which is not continuous at
(and therefore not differentiable):
Then, there is for all null sequences
and
with
:
Exercises: examples for derivatives
Exercise (Derivatives of linear and quadratic functions)
Determine (using the definition) the derivative of a linear function
and of a quadratic function
with
.
Solution (Derivatives of linear and quadratic functions)
1. linear function: For
there is
2. quadratic function: For
there is
Exercise (Derivative of the logarithm function)
Compute the derivative of the natural logarithm function
directly, using the differential quotient.
Solution (Derivative of the logarithm function)
1st way:
For
there is
Nun for
we have the inequality
If we swap the roles of
and
, then there is
Since the left and right-hand sides of the inequality for
converge towards
, the squeeze theorem implies
2nd way:
-method
For
there is
Solution (Computing the derivatives of hyperbolic functions
and
)
Part 1:
Let
. Then, there is
Alternative proof:
Part 2:
Let
. Then, there is
Alternative proof:
Part 3:
Let
. Then, there is
So
Alternative proof:
Computation rules for derivatives
Applying the computation rules
Exercise (derivatives of a power function)
Show by induction in
, that the power function
is differentiable with
Proof (derivatives of a power function)
Induction base: 
If
, then there is
Induction assumption:
For
with
, there is
Induction step: 
Exercise (Derivatives of secant and cosecant)
The functions
(secant) and
(cosecant) are defined as follows:
as well as
Determine their domain of definition and all derivatives.
Solution (Computing derivatives)
Part 1:
domain of definition:
Derivative: For
there is with the product rule
Part 2:
domain of definition:
, as
Derivative: For
there is with the chain rule
Part 3:
domain of definition:
Derivative: For
there is with the chain- and product rule
Part 4:
domain of definition:
, since there must be


Derivative: For
there is with the quotient rule
Part 5:
domain of definition:
Derivative:
For
there is
For
there is
Further there is
as well as
So we have
Concluding all three cases, we get for
Exercise (derivatives of exponential functions)
Determine the derivatives of the following functions on their domain of definition (
)





For the function
we may leave out the bracket, since in general
dis well-defined.
Use the binomial theorem and set
. Then take the derivative on both sides.
Proof (Proof of sum formulas using the derivative)
For
the binomial theorem reads
for
and
. Now the left-hand side of the equation is a polynomial
and the right-hand side is a power function
. Both sides are therefore differentiable on
with
and
Since
there is also
. So in particular
and
Proof of computational laws
Exercise (Alternative proof of the product rule)
Prove that for differentiable
the product rule
holds - by using the chain rule.
Hint: There is:
Proof (Alternative proof of the product rule)
The function
is differentiable on
with
By der chain rule, we hence have that
is differentiable with
for all
. Using the hint, we get with the factor- and sum rule
Exercise (Special case of the chain rule)
Derive a general derivative formula for the following function:
If
are differentiable.
Solution (Special case of the chain rule)
There is
with
and
for all
. The function
is differentiable by the product rule with
By the chain rule, also
is differentiable, and there is