Let us turn our attention to the root test, which is a powerful tool for proving the convergence or divergence of a given series. It is based off the direct comparison test, in fact we will compare the series with the geometric series
with
.
Derivation
Recap
We have already learned how to use the direct comparison test with a majorant. In summary, a series
with
is convergent, if there exists a convergent series
with
.
Furthermore we know that every geometric series
with
is convergent.
First derivation
Let
be a series. Also let
for all
, because this is a constraint we need for the direct comparison test. For our majorant we need a
with
. Then we have
The series
is convergent by our direct comparison test. The inequality
can be transformed:
Thus if there exists a
with
, so that
, then
and the series
is convergent.
Bringing limit superior into play
For the convergence behaviour we can ignore the value of finitely many summands. Thus
must not be satisfied for all
, but for all
, with finitely many exceptions. So the inequality
must be satisfied for almost all
.
We can restate the requirement, that there must exist a
with
for almost all
, using the limit superior:
Or in other terms:
If
for almost all
, the succession
is bounded above and must have an accumulation point less than or equal to
. This accumulation point is equal to
and
.
Conversely, let
for a
. Then for all all
the inequality
is satisfied for almost all
. Because
there exists
, that is small enough so that
. Set
. We have
and the inequality
holds for almost all
.
Summary: Instead of
for almost all
it suffices to show
, to prove convergence the series.
What about absolute convergence?
What happens if not all
? Then we cannot use the above argumentation, because for even
and
the values
is not defined. But we still have a valid argumentation if we talk about
, to show the absolute convergence of the series (from which normal convergence follows immediately). Thus for series with
for all
we have
. In this case nothing changes because for
we can also use
. The conclusion is:
Root test for divergence
We have derived the root test to show the convergence of a series. Can we also derive a criterion for divergence? Let us assume that
. Then for infinitely many
we have the inequality
. For these
we have
, thus
cannot be a null sequence. But then
is also no null sequence. From the term test it follows immediately that
is divergent. We can generalize this case if instead of
we require the inequality
for almost all
.
Theorem
The proof uses the same ideas as the derivation above:
Proof (Root test)
Proof step: From
follows the absolute convergence of
.
Hint
If
is convergent, then
. Therefore we could also consider the limit
if it exists. This is usually done when proving convergence using the root test.
Limitations of the root test
In case
we cannot say whether we have convergence or divergence. In fact there exist both convergent and divergent series that satisfy this equation. First consider the harmonic series
, which is divergent. We have
But also the convergent series
satisfies this equation:
These examples show that we cannot conclude convergence or divergence from
. In this case we have to employ another convergence criterion!
How to apply the root test
To apply the root test on a series
we can proceed as follows: We compute
and find the limit (if the limit exists) or the limit superior.
- If
, then the series converges absolutely.
- If
, then the series diverges.
- If
for infinitely many
, then the series diverges.
- Else, if none of the above is true, we cannot make a statement about convergence behaviour using the root test.
Exercises
Exercise 1
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Aufgabe
Exercise 2
Math for Non-Geeks: Template:Aufgabe
- ↑ Siehe the answer to the question „Where is the root test first proved“ of Q&A website „History of Science and Mathematics“