MoS

See also: Appendix:Variations of "mos"

English

Noun

MoS

  1. Alternative letter-case form of MOS (manual of style).
    • 2006 July 6, Janice Gelb, “Chicago MoS Online At Last”, in bit.listserv.techwr-l[1] (Usenet), archived from the original on 22 April 2025:
      I just thought others on this list might be as happy as I am to learn that as of September, the Chicago Manual of Style is going to be available online for a subscription fee of $25 introductory price, $30 regular fee.
    • 2012, “Responsible Parties”, in Christine M. Micheel, Sharly J. Nass, Gilbert S. Omenn, editors, Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward, Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, →ISBN, pages 140, 148 (Journals), and 159 (References):
      The Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors (MoS), for example, outlines several requirements that journals could implement to prevent bias and COI from undermining the credibility of reports containing original data (Fontanarosa et al., 2011; MoS, 2007). [] For example, the MoS states that if there is an error in a published paper that can be proved with data, a correction should be published and attached to the original article in PubMed. [] MoS (Manual of Style). 2007. AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors, 10th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
    • 2022, Susanne Kopf, “The Article Page”, in A Discursive Perspective on Wikipedia: More than an Encyclopaedia?, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, →ISBN, chapter 2 (Wikipedia’s Architecture and Modus Operandi), section 1 (Wikipedia Site Structure), pages 33–34:
      Wikipedia’s Manual of Style (MoS) provides information on a variety of aspects regarding Wikipedia articles, reaching from regulating the overall article structure to the visual presentation of information (such as the italicisation of words) to aspects of formality and register (Wikipedia:Manual of Style, Wikipedia, 2021). [] Still, she also identified similarities that suggest alignment with the MoS, for instance, both Wikipedia and the Encyclopaedia Britannica exhibit similar frequency in terms of impersonal pronoun usage (Elia, 2006).
    • 2024 December 20, Chokan Baimukhamedov, Marina Baimukhamedova, “Late-onset rheumatoid arthritis: Justifying the need for international practice guidelines and classification criteria”, in Modern Rheumatology, volume 35, number 3 (May 2025), Tokyo: Japan College of Rheumatology, →DOI, →ISSN, →OCLC, reference 3, page 598, column 1:
      Frey T, Young RK, Committee A. MoS. 505Correct and preferred usage. In: JAMA Network Editors (ed.), AMA Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020, 505–50.