Reconstruction:Proto-Bodish/(ḥ)waŋ
Proto-Bodish
Etymology
From Proto-Sino-Tibetan *waŋ.
Verb
*(ḥ)waŋ
Reconstruction notes
Odd behaviour seems to permeate the descendants of this root.
- Bodt reconstructs an *o in this verb,[1] and is confused at how both Dakpa-Dzala and Tibetan agree on *o in this verb. Either Tibetic was the source of the o in Dakpa-Dzala, or that this word had an early wave of Laufer's law rounding.
- Tibetan ཡོང (yong)'s derivation is uncertain; it could be either due to honorific palatalization (as Jacques puts it) or a regular *w > y shift causing it to phonetically diverge from present stem འོང ('ong). The latter possibility does not explain the Dakpa-Dzala initials, though, since Dakpa-Dzala also usually has *w > y-.
Descendants
- Tibetic
- Dakpa-Dzala
- Dakpa: [Term?] (/(ɤ)oŋ35/)
- Dzala: ཝོང (wong)
References
- ^ Bodt, Timotheus Adrianus (2023) “East Bodish revisited”, in Bulletin of Tibetology[1], volume 54, number 1, Gangtok: Namgyal Institute of Tibetology, →ISSN, page 157