Reconstruction:Proto-Italic/proβwāō
Proto-Italic
Etymology
From *proβwos (“correct, proper”) + *-āō (factitive deadjectival suffix).[1]
Verb
*proβwāō
- to approve
Conjugation
| Inflection of *proβwāō (first conjugation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Present | *proβwāō | |
| Perfect | — | |
| Aorist | — | |
| Past participle | *proβwātos | |
| Present indicative | Active | Passive |
| 1st sing. | *proβwāō | *proβwāōr |
| 2nd sing. | *proβwās | *proβwāzo |
| 3rd sing. | *proβwāt | *proβwātor |
| 1st plur. | *proβwāmos | *proβwāmor |
| 2nd plur. | *proβwātes | *proβwām(e?)n(ai?) |
| 3rd plur. | *proβwānt | *proβwāntor |
| Present subjunctive | Active | Passive |
| 1st sing. | *proβwāēm? | *proβwāēr? |
| 2nd sing. | *proβwāēs? | *proβwāēzo? |
| 3rd sing. | *proβwāēd? | *proβwāētor? |
| 1st plur. | *proβwāēmos? | *proβwāēmor? |
| 2nd plur. | *proβwāētes? | *proβwāēm(e?)n(ai?)? |
| 3rd plur. | *proβwāēnd? | *proβwāēntor? |
| Perfect indicative | Active | |
| 1st sing. | — | |
| 2nd sing. | — | |
| 3rd sing. | — | |
| 1st plur. | — | |
| 2nd plur. | — | |
| 3rd plur. | — | |
| Aorist indicative | Active | |
| 1st sing. | — | |
| 2nd sing. | — | |
| 3rd sing. | — | |
| 1st plur. | — | |
| 2nd plur. | — | |
| 3rd plur. | — | |
| Present imperative | Active | Passive |
| 2nd sing. | *proβwā | *proβwāzo |
| 2nd plur. | *proβwāte | — |
| Future imperative | Active | |
| 2nd + 3rd sing. | *proβwātōd | |
| Participles | Present | Past |
| *proβwānts | *proβwātos | |
| Verbal nouns | tu-derivative | s-derivative |
| *proβwātum | *proβwāzi | |
Reconstruction notes
Descendants
- Latin: probō (see there for further descendants)
- Oscan: 𐌐𐌓𐌞𐌚𐌀𐌕𐌕𐌄𐌃 (prúfatted, perf. 3sg.)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 De Vaan, Michiel (2008) “prō”, in Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 7), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, pages 489-90: “probus”
- ^ Benjamin W. Fortson IV (2017) “The dialectology of Italic”, in Brian Joseph, Matthias Fritz, and Jared Klein, editors, Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics, De Gruyter