Anyone know what is included in the racket/base language. I am looking to compare the racket/base namespace definitions with the R7RS draft to get a first hand idea of how divergent Racket is from Scheme.
- 29,301
 - 3
 - 67
 - 110
 
- 7,023
 - 11
 - 38
 - 60
 
2 Answers
The difference is going to be huge, just like any other practical Scheme implementation.  To give you a rough idea, I see more than 1300 identifiers from racket/base, and racket goes up to over 2000.  Also, note that comparing the names is not going to be the whole story -- there are additional differences, like the fact that Racket uses immutable pairs by default, and like the fact that you get guaranteed left-to-right evaluation order.
A quick way to get the lists yourself for the former would be to make sure that XREPL is installed (have your ~/.racketrc file contain (require xrepl)), then start Racket with racket/base as the REPL language, and use the ,ap (apropos) command with no arguments so it shows you all of the bound names:
$ racket -I racket/base
Welcome to Racket v5.2.1.
-> ,ap
To read about the names, you can use the ,doc command, or just use the search box in the docs.
- 29,301
 - 3
 - 67
 - 110
 
- 
                    Straight to the point answer and by the way, the r7rs draft looks like a practical language. – cobie Jul 12 '12 at 19:28
 - 
                    3"Practical" is a relative term... It's more practical than r5rs, but it won't have threads, subprocesses, network, non-blocking IO, and a gazillion other things, so the difference is huge. Even the big language will not have all of these. – Eli Barzilay Jul 12 '12 at 19:56
 
According to The Racket Reference:
Unless otherwise noted, the bindings defined in this manual are exported by the racket/base and racket languages.
Unfortunately that is not terribly helpful since it is a large reference manual. But, since you are comparing R7RS to Racket, it may be useful to just browse through the whole reference to get an idea of what is available.
- 131,333
 - 52
 - 229
 - 284