Is it possible to read binary stdout from an adb shell command? For example, all examples of how to use screencap include two steps:
adb shell screencap -p /sdcard/foo.png
adb pull /sdcard/foo.png
However, the service supports writing to stdout. You can for instance, do the following:
adb shell "screencap -p > /sdcard/foo2.png"
adb pull /sdcard/foo2.png
And this works equally well. But, what about reading the output across ADB? What I want to do is the following:
adb shell screencap -p > foo3.png
And avoid the intermediate write to the SD card.  This generates something that looks like a PNG file (running strings foo3.png generates something with an IHDR, IEND, etc.) and is approximately the same size, but the file is corrupted as far as image readers are concerned.
I have also attempted to do this using ddmlib in java and the results are the same. I would be happy to use any library necessary. My goal is to reduce total time to get the capture. On my device, using the two-command solution, it takes about 3 seconds to get the image. Using ddmlib and capturing stdout takes less than 900ms, but it doesn't work!
Is it possible to do this?
EDIT: Here is the hexdump of two files. The first one, screen.png came from stdout and is corrupted. The second one, xscreen is from the two-command solution and works. The images should be visually identical.
$ hexdump -C screen.png | head
00000000  89 50 4e 47 0d 0d 0a 1a  0d 0a 00 00 00 0d 49 48  |.PNG..........IH|
00000010  44 52 00 00 02 d0 00 00  05 00 08 06 00 00 00 6e  |DR.............n|
00000020  ce 65 3d 00 00 00 04 73  42 49 54 08 08 08 08 7c  |.e=....sBIT....||
00000030  08 64 88 00 00 20 00 49  44 41 54 78 9c ec bd 79  |.d... .IDATx...y|
00000040  9c 1d 55 9d f7 ff 3e 55  75 f7 de b7 74 77 d2 d9  |..U...>Uu...tw..|
00000050  bb b3 27 10 48 42 16 c0  20 01 86 5d 14 04 11 dc  |..'.HB.. ..]....|
00000060  78 44 9d c7 d1 d1 11 78  70 7e 23 33 8e 1b 38 33  |xD.....xp~#3..83|
00000070  ea 2c 8c 8e 0d 0a 08 a8  23 2a 0e 10 82 ac c1 40  |.,......#*.....@|
00000080  12 02 81 24 64 ef ec 5b  ef fb 5d 6b 3b bf 3f ea  |...$d..[..]k;.?.|
00000090  de db dd 49 27 e9 ee 74  77 3a e3 79 bf 5e 37 e7  |...I'..tw:.y.^7.|
$ hexdump -C xscreen.png | head
00000000  89 50 4e 47 0d 0a 1a 0a  00 00 00 0d 49 48 44 52  |.PNG........IHDR|
00000010  00 00 02 d0 00 00 05 00  08 06 00 00 00 6e ce 65  |.............n.e|
00000020  3d 00 00 00 04 73 42 49  54 08 08 08 08 7c 08 64  |=....sBIT....|.d|
00000030  88 00 00 20 00 49 44 41  54 78 9c ec 9d 77 98 1c  |... .IDATx...w..|
00000040  c5 99 ff 3f d5 dd 93 37  27 69 57 5a e5 55 4e 08  |...?...7'iWZ.UN.|
00000050  24 a1 00 58 18 04 26 08  8c 01 83 31 38 c0 19 9f  |$..X..&....18...|
00000060  ef 7c c6 3e 1f 70 f8 7e  67 ee 71 e2 b0 ef ce f6  |.|.>.p.~g.q.....|
00000070  f9 ec 73 04 1b 1c 31 60  23 84 30 22 88 a0 40 10  |..s...1`#.0"..@.|
00000080  08 65 69 95 d3 4a 9b c3  c4 4e f5 fb a3 67 66 77  |.ei..J...N...gfw|
00000090  a5 95 b4 bb da a4 73 7d  9e 67 55 f3 ed 50 5d dd  |......s}.gU..P].|
Just at quick glance it seems like a couple of extra 0x0d (13) bytes get added. Carriage return?? Does that ring any bells? Is it mixing in some blank lines?
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    