`ui-router` $stateParams vs. $state.params

Question

With ui-router, it's possible to inject either $state or $stateParams into a controller to get access to parameters in the URL. However, accessing parameters through $stateParams only exposes parameters belonging to the state managed by the controller that accesses it, and its parent states, while $state.params has all parameters, including those in any child states.

Given the following code, if we directly load the URL http://path/1/paramA/paramB, this is how it goes when the controllers load:

$stateProvider.state('a', {
     url: 'path/:id/:anotherParam/',
     controller: 'ACtrl',
  });

$stateProvider.state('a.b', {
     url: '/:yetAnotherParam',
     controller: 'ABCtrl',
  });

module.controller('ACtrl', function($stateParams, $state) {
   $state.params; // has id, anotherParam, and yetAnotherParam
   $stateParams;  // has id and anotherParam
}

module.controller('ABCtrl', function($stateParams, $state) {
   $state.params; // has id, anotherParam, and yetAnotherParam
   $stateParams;  // has id, anotherParam, and yetAnotherParam
}

The question is, why the difference? And are there best practices guidelines around when and why you should use, or avoid using either of them?

Answer 1

The documentation reiterates your findings here: https://github.com/angular-ui/ui-router/wiki/URL-Routing#stateparams-service

If my memory serves, $stateParams was introduced later than the original $state.params, and seems to be a simple helper injector to avoid continuously writing $state.params.

I doubt there are any best practice guidelines, but context wins out for me. If you simply want access to the params received into the url, then use $stateParams. If you want to know something more complex about the state itself, use $state.

Answer 2

Another reason to use $state.params is for non-URL based state, which (to my mind) is woefully underdocumented and very powerful.

I just discovered this while googling about how to pass state without having to expose it in the URL and answered a question elsewhere on SO.

Basically, it allows this sort of syntax:

<a ui-sref="toState(thingy)" class="list-group-item" ng-repeat="thingy in thingies">{{ thingy.referer }}</a>

Answer 3

EDIT: This answer is correct for version 0.2.10. As @Alexander Vasilyev pointed out it doesn't work in version 0.2.14.

Another reason to use $state.params is when you need to extract query parameters like this:

$stateProvider.state('a', {
  url: 'path/:id/:anotherParam/?yetAnotherParam',
  controller: 'ACtrl',
});

module.controller('ACtrl', function($stateParams, $state) {
  $state.params; // has id, anotherParam, and yetAnotherParam
  $stateParams;  // has id and anotherParam
}

Answer 4

There are many differences between these two. But while working practically I have found that using $state.params better. When you use more and more parameters this might be confusing to maintain in $stateParams. where if we use multiple params which are not URL param $state is very useful

 .state('shopping-request', {
      url: '/shopping-request/{cartId}',
      data: {requireLogin: true},
      params : {role: null},
      views: {
        '': {templateUrl: 'views/templates/main.tpl.html', controller: "ShoppingRequestCtrl"},
        'body@shopping-request': {templateUrl: 'views/shops/shopping-request.html'},
        'footer@shopping-request': {templateUrl: 'views/templates/footer.tpl.html'},
        'header@shopping-request': {templateUrl: 'views/templates/header.tpl.html'}
      }
    })

Answer 5

I have a root state which resolves sth. Passing $state as a resolve parameter won't guarantee the availability for $state.params. But using $stateParams will.

var rootState = {
    name: 'root',
    url: '/:stubCompanyId',
    abstract: true,
    ...
};

// case 1:
rootState.resolve = {
    authInit: ['AuthenticationService', '$state', function (AuthenticationService, $state) {
        console.log('rootState.resolve', $state.params);
        return AuthenticationService.init($state.params);
    }]
};
// output:
// rootState.resolve Object {}

// case 2:
rootState.resolve = {
    authInit: ['AuthenticationService', '$stateParams', function (AuthenticationService, $stateParams) {
        console.log('rootState.resolve', $stateParams);
        return AuthenticationService.init($stateParams);
    }]
};
// output:
// rootState.resolve Object {stubCompanyId:...}

Using "angular": "~1.4.0", "angular-ui-router": "~0.2.15"

Answer 6

An interesting observation I made while passing previous state params from one route to another is that $stateParams gets hoisted and overwrites the previous route's state params that were passed with the current state params, but using $state.params doesn't.

When using $stateParams:

var stateParams        = {};
stateParams.nextParams = $stateParams; //{item_id:123}
stateParams.next       = $state.current.name;

$state.go('app.login', stateParams);
//$stateParams.nextParams on app.login is now:
//{next:'app.details', nextParams:{next:'app.details'}}

When using $state.params:

var stateParams        = {};
stateParams.nextParams = $state.params; //{item_id:123}
stateParams.next       = $state.current.name;

$state.go('app.login', stateParams);
//$stateParams.nextParams on app.login is now:
//{next:'app.details', nextParams:{item_id:123}}

Answer 7

Here in this article is clearly explained: The $state service provides a number of useful methods for manipulating the state as well as pertinent data on the current state. The current state parameters are accessible on the $state service at the params key. The $stateParams service returns this very same object. Hence, the $stateParams service is strictly a convenience service to quickly access the params object on the $state service.

As such, no controller should ever inject both the $state service and its convenience service, $stateParams. If the $state is being injected just to access the current parameters, the controller should be rewritten to inject $stateParams instead.