What is the correct way of ensuring a single instance of a class?

Question

In java I would create something like this:

private static MyClass instance;

public static MyClass getInstance() {
  if(instance != null) {
    return instance;
  }
  instance = new MyClass();
  return instance;
}

What is the appropriate way to obtain the same functionality in ruby?

Update: I've read about 'include Singleton' but when I tried to do it in irb on Ruby 1.9 I got:

[vertis@raven:~/workspace/test]$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.1p378 (2010-01-10 revision 26273) [i386-darwin9.4.0]
[vertis@raven:~/workspace/test]$ irb
irb(main):001:0> class TestTest
irb(main):002:1>   include Singleton
irb(main):003:1> end
NameError: uninitialized constant TestTest::Singleton
    from (irb):2:in `<class:TestTest>'
    from (irb):1
    from /usr/local/bin/irb:12:in `<main>'

Worked out that I just needed a require statement...the fact remains though that a discussion about the correct way of doing it (and the need for it at all isn't wasted) — Luke Chadwick, Feb 23 '10 at 02:05

score 5 · Accepted Answer · answered Feb 22 '10 at 11:29

there are already answers to how to do it in Ruby, but I'd ask first do you need to?

There is no need to copy your Java patterns to Ruby. I'm doing Ruby from 2005 and never did I need a singleton class.

Why do you need an instance to begin with? Why can't you just define class methods and call them on the class.

As I understand you are trying smth like:

instance = Klass.new
instance.foo
.. then somewhere else
instance = Klass.new # expecting this to return the same instance
instance.bar

But instead you can just do this:

Klass.foo
... in other place
Klass.bar

And since thre is only one class Klass your problem is natively solved and with less to type too :)

classes in Ruby are just instances of class Class, so they can have everything an instance can have.

What is the correct way of ensuring a single instance of a class?

1 Answers1

Linked