Why using Fragments?

Question

I have read the documentation and some other questions' threads about this topic and I don't really feel convinced; I don't see clearly the limits of use of this technique.

Fragments are now seen as a Best Practice; every Activity should be basically a support for one or more Fragments and not call a layout directly.

Fragments are created in order to:

allow the Activity to use many fragments, to change between them, to reuse these units... ==> the Fragment is totally dependent to the Context of an activity , so if I need something generic that I can reuse and handle in many Activities, I can create my own custom layouts or Views ... I will not care about this additional Complexity Developing Layer that fragments would add.
a better handling to different resolution ==> OK for tablets/phones in case of long process that we can show two (or more) fragments in the same Activity in Tablets, and one by one in phones. But why would I use fragments always ?
handling callbacks to navigate between Fragments (i.e: if the user is Logged-in I show a fragment else I show another fragment). ===> Just try to see how many bugs facebook SDK Log-in have because of this, to understand that it is really (?) ...
considering that an Android Application is based on Activities... Adding another life cycles in the Activity would be better to design an Application... I mean the modules, the scenarios, the data management and the connectivity would be better designed, in that way. ===> This is an answer of someone who's used to see the Android SDK and Android Framework with a Fragments vision. I don't think it's wrong, but I am not sure it will give good results... And it is really abstract...

====> Why would I complicate my life, coding more, in using them always? else, why is it a best practice if it's just a tool for some cases? what are these cases?

I am sorry if I wrote too much, and thanks for your time. I hope I will get your attention, because I really need ideas and experiences about this topic.

Best regards, Ahmed

if you can easily live without them then forget about them... i too think that at least 50% of their usage in peoples code is redundant, — pskink, Jun 12 '14 at 10:16
possible duplicate of [To Fragment or not to Fragment - Nested Fragments against Activities. Why should I use more than one Activity?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19927452/to-fragment-or-not-to-fragment-nested-fragments-against-activities-why-should) — Frame91, Jun 12 '14 at 12:31
possible duplicate of [When should I use fragments in Android applications ? Why to use fragments?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8597769/when-should-i-use-fragments-in-android-applications-why-to-use-fragments) — Krishnabhadra, Dec 02 '14 at 10:33
yes it is true, I am not the only that had this question. It was long time ago... And if I would ask the question now, I would say "why wouldn't I use fragments?"... — ahmed_khan_89, Dec 02 '14 at 22:48

score 2 · Answer 1 · answered Jun 12 '14 at 12:28

2

You shouldn't always use fragments. Fragments have their uses, such as when you want to page in and out parts of the screen or when you want to drastically change the UI in different orientations. When they make sense, use them. When they don't, skip them. I find they make sense in maybe about 10-20% of apps- I rarely see the need.

answered Jun 12 '14 at 12:28

Gabe Sechan

90,003
9
87
127

2

And the biggest question, when and why they "make sense" is not answered. Imho this is a "bla" answer... – WarrenFaith Jun 12 '14 at 13:32

score 1 · Answer 2 · answered Jun 12 '14 at 12:24

If there's a certain positive aspect apart from the simpler reuse of logic through different layouts, it's the ability of Fragments to be kept alive by the system at orientation change, aka while an Activity is reconstructed from zero, a Fragment can retain its instance, and therefore using them is more stable than an Activity. Also, switching between Fragments is quicker.

Personally, if I don't need to mess around with different orientations and layout sizes, I still prefer using Fragments and a singular container Activity around it, for stability and seamless switching between the different screens.

switching between fragments is not faster then switching between views. It's faster than swiching between Activities of course. the good point is about orientation. thx — ahmed_khan_89, Jun 12 '14 at 12:34

score 1 · Answer 3 · answered Jun 12 '14 at 12:26

Its quite a general question and not directly related to a specific programming problem. But in my opinion good software is based on good design and therefore a good understanding and best practices. So your question is a good one for stackoverflow.

So, what about fragments. It took me a while to understand why you could or even should use them. As @pskink said, you can easily live without them. But if you are planning to rollout your software on different devices, you should definately think about fragments.

The screen resolution and density is not the only problem. Think about a smartphone. The screen is much smaller, so you can not present your app the same way as you can on a tablet. For instance a master detail flow. Left side, a list of elements and when you click one element, you will see details of that element on the right side. Easy to do on a tablet. But on a smartphone you would put the master-view into one fragment and the detail-view into another one.

You got two options to realize that scenario. Either programm different activities for smartphone and tablet but because they are actually doing the same logic, it's better practice to put the logic into fragments and reuse those fragments in two layouts (phone/tablet).

Why using Fragments?

3 Answers3

Linked