In discussion of this answer we realized that tuples do not have a __reversed__ method. My guess was that creating the iterator would require mutating the tuple. And yet tuples play fine with reversed. Why can't the approach used for reversed be made to work for __reversed__ as well?
>>> foo = range(3)
>>> foo
[0, 1, 2]
>>> list(foo.__reversed__())
[2, 1, 0]
>>> foo
[0, 1, 2]
>>> bar = (0, 1, 2)
>>> list(bar.__reversed__())
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
AttributeError: 'tuple' object has no attribute '__reversed__'
>>> reversed(bar)
<reversed object at 0x10603b310>
>>> tuple(reversed(bar))
(2, 1, 0)