In a normal case, sed can edit the stream from another command simply by piping:
./somecommand | sed 's/xx/yy/g'
However, the sed command I'm using is a little complex. Previously, I had gotten help with optimizing sed for a specific use case:
Optimize shell script for multiple sed replacements
The eventual outcome was that for my use case, the following sed command was the most optimal:
./somecommand > file
sed -e 's/^/s|/; s/$/|g/;' replacement_list | sed -r -f - -i file
Basically, the first sed command creates a list of sed operations from a file with pairs of substitions. The second sed command then uses the stream via piping and utilises the -f option to process the file.
Things have changed a little since and now I've manage to get somecommand to output results in stdout instead of writing to a file, but I can't think of a way to rewrite the above set of commands correctly. Part of the difficulty is that the second sed command is already using the stream from the first sed command.
One thing I've tried is to assign the stdout of somecommand to a variable and attempt to <<< it into the second sed command. However, that didn't work. 
 
     
    