ASSERT vs. ATLASSERT vs. assert

Question

I am refactoring some MFC code that is littered with ASSERT statements, and in preparation for a future Linux port I want to replace them with the standard assert. Are there any significant differences between the two implementations that people know of that could bite me on the backside?

Similarly, I have also come across some code that uses ATLASSERT which I would also like to replace.

score 5 · Accepted Answer · answered Nov 06 '08 at 22:36

5

No. The MFC version just includes an easy to debug break point.

answered Nov 06 '08 at 22:36

KJAWolf

2,722
1
15
6

score 3 · Answer 2 · edited May 23 '17 at 11:49

3

Replace them with your own assertion macro. That's how you get the most benefit out of it (logging, stack trace, etc.)

edited May 23 '17 at 11:49

Community

1
1

answered Nov 06 '08 at 22:23

Carl Seleborg

13,125
11
58
70

score 1 · Answer 3 · answered Nov 06 '08 at 23:18

I would recommend either using your own macro, or #define's for the linux compilation. There's no compelling reason to give up any extra helpfulness on the Windows side (eg: built-in breakpoint), and no compelling reason to change a lot of code when some simple compatibility #define's will suffice.

ASSERT vs. ATLASSERT vs. assert

3 Answers3