I have a Java SE 8 Spring 4.1.6-RELEASE application, where I am implementing the org.springframework.jdbc.core.RowMapper<T> interface, and I had some questions about the java.sql.ResultSet interface that is passed in its T mapRow(ResultSet rs, int rowNum) method.
When I inspect the ResultSet class, I see a bunch of methods to get column values back:
╔══════════════╦═════════════════════╦════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ Return Type ║ Method ║ Return (javadoc, se 8) ║ ╠══════════════╬═════════════════════╬════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ String ║ getString ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ boolean ║ getBoolean ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is false ║ ║ byte ║ getByte ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is 0 ║ ║ short ║ getShort ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is 0 ║ ║ int ║ getInt ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is 0 ║ ║ long ║ getLong ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is 0 ║ ║ float ║ getFloat ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is 0 ║ ║ double ║ getDouble ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is 0 ║ ║ BigDecimal ║ getBigDecimal ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ byte[] ║ getBytes ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ Date ║ getDate ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ Time ║ getTime ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ Timestamp ║ getTimestamp ║ the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ InputStream ║ getAsciiStream ║ a Java input stream that delivers the database column value as a stream of one-byte ASCII characters; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ Reader ║ getCharacterStream ║ a java.io.Reader object that contains the column value; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null in the Java programming language ║ ║ InputStream ║ getBinaryStream ║ a Java input stream that delivers the database column value as a stream of uninterpreted bytes; if the value is SQL NULL, the value returned is null ║ ║ <T> T ║ getObject ║ an instance of type holding the column value ║ ╚══════════════╩═════════════════════╩════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Is the genernal expectation / practice to call:
rs.getObject("COLUMN_NAME", Boolean.class);
rs.getObject("COLUMN_NAME", Byte.class);
rs.getObject("COLUMN_NAME", Short.class);
rs.getObject("COLUMN_NAME", Integer.class);
rs.getObject("COLUMN_NAME", Long.class);
etc., for all of the primitive types? As everything else returns null for the instance of SQL NULL.
If so, what's the point of having all the methods for the different types when the typed Object method is there?
Also, what are the pros/cons of each approach?
Using
getInt(String columnLabel):Integer resultingActionId = rs.getInt("RESULTING_ACTION_ID"); if (rs.wasNull) { resultingActionId = null }Using
getObject(String columnLabel)and casting toInteger:Integer resultingActionId = (Integer) rs.getObject("RESULTING_ACTION_ID");Using
getObject(String columnLabel, Class type):Integer resultingActionId = rs.getObject("RESULTING_ACTION_ID", Integer.class);
For instance, I noticed the org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate used to have , queryForLong, etc. methods for getting a single value from a single row query and replaced them all in favor of a typed queryForIntqueryForObject method.
Thanks!