I have this plunker to illustrate my problem:
http://plnkr.co/edit/tsBy2K0xv6bboBlZRM8c
$scope.start = function() {
  runThisUntil("Ok");
  //here I would like to do this:
  //runThisUntil("Ok").then(function () {
  //doSomeStuff()  
  //});
}
$scope.clear = function() {
  $scope.responses = [];
}
function runThisUntil(criteria) {
  runThis(criteria);
}
function runThis(criteria) {
  run().then(function (response) {
    if (response == criteria) {
      $scope.responses.push("Done");
    } else {
      $scope.responses.push("Wait");
      runThisUntil(criteria);
    }
  });
}
var okWhen = 10;
var start = 0;
function run() {
  var deferred = $q.defer();
  $timeout(function () {
    if (start !== okWhen) {
    start += 1;
    deferred.resolve("Bad");
  } else {
    deferred.resolve("Ok")
    start = 0;
  }
  }, 100);
  return deferred.promise;
}
}
What I'm trying to simulate here is form of loop where I do requests to an http server that does work in batches and respondes with "There is still more work" until "Work is done".
When I tried to do this with promises I ended up creating new deferred promises with $q so the initial promise I was waiting for to be resolved never got resolved because the request was repeated which I do by executing the same function that I am in again if it's not done.
--Edit I figured I could do this with a $scope.$broadcast() when it's done, but I would like to solve this by using $q if possible and not listen to events if possible.
 
     
    