Which is the correct way to make fragments inheritance with newInstance pattern?
For example, if we have a fragment MyFragment that inherits from another fragment SuperFragment which has the newInstance pattern --> https://stackoverflow.com/a/28855715/5125212
public class SuperFragment extends Fragment{
    public static SuperFragment newInstance(int var1, boolean var2){
        SuperFragment fragment = new SuperFragment();
        Bundle b = new Bundle();
        b.putInt("my_var1", var1);
        b.putBoolean("my_var2", var2);
        fragment.setArguements(b);
        return fragment
    }
// All other methods
}
This gets an error on "super":
public class MyFragment extends SuperFragment{
    public static MyFragment newInstance(int var1, boolean var2){
        return super.newInstance(int var1, var2);
    }
// All other methods
}
And this gets an error on constructor as we should avoid non-default constructors:
public class MyFragment extends SuperFragment{
    public MyFragment(int var1, boolean var2){
        newInstance(var1, var2);
    } 
// All other methods
}
And I found this to don't have any error but I don't like it because it semms to get recursively:
public class MyFragment extends SuperFragment{
    public static SuperFragment newInstance(int var1, boolean var2){
        return newInstance(var1,var2);
    }
}
 
     
    