9

There is a certain Chrome extension and I want to get a PNG file from it by XMLHttpRequest. If the extension is enabled, I want to write 'load' to the console, and if the extension is disabled, I want to write 'error' to the console.

It works fine, but if the Extension is disabled, Chrome writes an error in the console that I do not want to appear:

enter image description here

enter image description here

How can I remove this error from the console?

(I have tried window.onerror but it doesn't work)

The code:

var loadHref = function(href) {
    var xmlhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
    xmlhttp.onload = function(){console.log('load')};
    xmlhttp.onerror = function() {console.log('error');};
    xmlhttp.open('GET', href);
    xmlhttp.send();
}
loadHref('chrome-extension://77672b238520494cba8855547dd00ba8/img/icon24.png');
sidanmor
  • 5,079
  • 3
  • 23
  • 31

2 Answers2

6

Basically, you can't silence those errors, as they are not JS errors but network errors.

Assuming your goal is to detect that a specific extension is present:

  1. Assume you need it at a specific domain and for a specific extension that is controlled by you.

    In this case, the optimal approach is externally_connectable communication. Here's a sample.

  2. Assume you need it at a non-specific domain not known in advance, but you control the extension.

    In this case, a Content Script can be injected (probably with "run_at": "document_start") and add something to the document signalling the presence of the extension. For example, injecting a page-level script that sets a variable.

  3. Assume you don't control the extension.

    Well, in that case you're screwed. If an extension won't cooperate in the manners described above, probing its web-accessible resources (if any!) is the only way to detect it, short of watching for specific content script activity in the DOM (again, if any).

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Xan
  • 74,770
  • 16
  • 179
  • 206
  • You are right, I want to identify Some Extension that it is not mine, and I need the console to be clear from errors, do you know any other way of doing that? Thanks... – sidanmor May 30 '16 at 10:25
  • Which part of "you're screwed" is not clear? But if you can detect some changes made to the DOM by a content script, that may be an alternative. It HIGHLY depends on what the extension does. – Xan May 30 '16 at 10:46
1

Actually, there is already an existing issue on error when chrome cast extension is not installed with google-cast-sdk and based on that issues tracker, this hasn't been totally resolved yet. There are, however, given workarounds from one of the comments:

the workarounds would be to either install the Google Cast extension or disable network warnings (please note you may miss some warnings that could be on interest to you) so you don't see these additional logs.

And, you may also try with the probable solutions given in this SO post - Google chrome cast sender error if chrome cast extension is not installed or using incognito and who knows, it might help. :)

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Teyam
  • 7,686
  • 3
  • 15
  • 22
  • Just as a note: this was "resolved" by Cast SDK by filtering out certain strings from console reporting in Chrome. In general, there is no way to silence tentative-request-to-extension failing from JS code, that's why such a workaround was necessary. – Xan May 30 '16 at 13:41