why should we use subscribe() over map() in Angular?

Question

I am trying to take advantage of observables in angular2 and got confused on why should i use map() over subscribe(). Suppose i am getting values from a webApi, like this

  this.http.get('http://172.17.40.41:8089/api/Master/GetAllCountry')

Now using subscribe(success, error, complete) I can get all the values on the success callback and I can return the values on the complete callback. If I can do all theses functionalities then what is the need of map()? Does it give any advantage?

In short, why one should write like this:

this.http.get('http://172.17.40.41:8089/api/Master/GetAllCountry')
    .map(r=>{})
    .subscribe(value => {
    }, error => error, () => {
});

when they can simply write this without the map function:

this.http.get('http://172.17.40.41:8089/api/Master/GetAllCountry')
    .subscribe(value => {        
    }, error => error, () => {           
});

.map(r=>{}) will result in undefined value. Please, explain your case in a reasonable way if you're looking for a reasonable answer. — Estus Flask, Feb 20 '17 at 11:06

score 94 · Accepted Answer · answered Feb 20 '17 at 11:08

If you want to return an Observable some other code can subscribe to, but you still want to manipulate the data events in the current method, use map.

The actual user of the observable needs to subscribe(), because without subscribe() the observable won't be executed at all. (forEach() or toArray() and probably others work as well to execute the observable instead of subscribe())

subscribe() returns a Subscription that can not be subscribed to, but it can be used to cancel the subscription.

map() returns an Observable which can be subscribed to.

To add to the answer, operations in `map` are executed asynchronously whereas operations in `subscribe` are executed synchronously. There's a performance improvement, albeit probably not huge in most cases, to doing as much work as possible in the `map` call. — Patrick, Jun 03 '22 at 04:11

score 35 · Answer 2 · answered Feb 20 '17 at 11:10

Think map as a middleware which transforms the response.

this.http.get('http://172.17.40.41:8089/api/Master/GetAllCountry')
.map(r=>r.json())
 .subscribe(result => {
              // here result would have json object that was parsed by map handler...
            },failurCallback,completeCallback)

subscribe is used to invoke the observable, please read a good doc on cold-vs-hot-observables

score 18 · Answer 3 · answered Feb 20 '17 at 11:08

18

You need subscribe to run your async request. If you just set map - no requests will trigger. You can check.

Good practice to use map to preproccess you data because many subscribers can comsume your results. So instead of adding preprocessing to each client (subscriber) you can prepare single output with single data schema for all.

answered Feb 20 '17 at 11:08

VadimB

5,533
2
34
48

The first paragraph doesn't answer the question, as OP isn't asking whether to subscribe or not. The second paragraph, however, is great. For some reason, the way you put it made more sense than the accepted answer for me. Thanks! – Patrick Jun 03 '22 at 04:06

score 3 · Answer 4 · answered Feb 27 '20 at 17:47

3

Observables are streams and they are designed to be written in functional streams. You should use RxJS operations because it is the 'functional' way of implementing subsctiptions to observables. Usually this happens when we take data outside of the Observable stream.

This is an asynchronous operation forced to work synchronously.

bad_example() {
  let id;
  this.obs.subscribe(param => id = param['id']);
    this.get(id).subscribe(elem => this.elem = elem);
}

This is an asynchronous operation that works as supposed to work. (As a stream)

good_example() {
  this.obs
    .map(param => param['id'])
    .switchMap(id => return this.get(id))
    .subscribe(elem => this.elem = elem);
}

answered Feb 27 '20 at 17:47

yeaaaahhhh..hamf hamf

746
2
13
34

so in the bad example you have used a variable to store data, and in your good example as you claim, you have this private member! please distinguish your opinions from good & bad practices – ProllyGeek Feb 14 '23 at 23:11
This is an asynchronous operation forced to work synchronously , so I think it is a bad practice to do that – yeaaaahhhh..hamf hamf Feb 28 '23 at 14:28

score 2 · Answer 5 · edited Jun 14 '18 at 07:08

2

.map() is an rxjs operator, it will show the result in array [] form either .json() form

https://www.learnrxjs.io/operators/transformation/map.html

edited Jun 14 '18 at 07:08

wscourge

10,657
14
59
80

answered Jun 14 '18 at 06:48

N4R35H

21
1

why should we use subscribe() over map() in Angular?

5 Answers5

Linked