I start to learn std::array and found function to access array with .at(index of element). Is there any reason to it over array.[index of element] style?(e.g speed, exception or other).   
            Asked
            
        
        
            Active
            
        
            Viewed 759 times
        
    -2
            
            
        
        Jasurbek Nabijonov
        
- 1,607
 - 3
 - 24
 - 37
 
- 
                    5Did you compare the documentation for those? What did you find out? – Mat Jul 05 '17 at 07:41
 - 
                    Possible duplicate of [vector::at vs. vector::operator\[\]](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9376049/vectorat-vs-vectoroperator) – t.niese Jul 05 '17 at 07:49
 - 
                    I found answer. With .at() it checks boundary of array. Where with [] operator it doesn't. – Jasurbek Nabijonov Jul 05 '17 at 07:52
 
1 Answers
2
            Consider (link)
const_reference operator[](size_type pos) const;
and (link)
const_reference at(size_type pos) const;
They both return a reference to the element at the specified location: pos. However, the former does not perform bounds checking, whereas the latter does.
In case !(pos < size()) the latter will throw an std::out_of_range exception.
        Jonas
        
- 6,915
 - 8
 - 35
 - 53