In Java, there is what is called package. Does library in C++ represent the same meaning, especially in terms for example of containg relative classes and the use of protected members?
Thanks.
Asked
Active
Viewed 4,957 times
7
Simplicity
- 47,404
- 98
- 256
- 385
-
Unfortunately I don't know how C# libraries work, but protected member are indeed visible from within the package and each package defines a separate namespace for class names, if that's what you meant. – biziclop Jan 25 '11 at 11:19
-
@biziclop. I'm actually asking about C++ not C#. – Simplicity Jan 25 '11 at 11:22
-
1@user588855 It turns out I can't even read. :) – biziclop Jan 25 '11 at 11:52
6 Answers
11
There are different dimensions of what a package means in Java. As a container that differentiates the names of the classes inside from the names of classes in other packages, its equivalent would be c++ namespaces.
As a unit that guarantees access to non-private members to classes in the same block, there is no equivalent in C++. The access level granted to a class is independent of the namespace where the class is defined.
As a way of ordering your sources in the disk, there is no equivalent, the C++ language has no requirements on how the code is stored in files.
Regarding c++ libraries, that is closer to jar files in Java. They bundle different classes that share some relation. A jar can contain more than one package, and more than one jar can contain classes from the same package. Similarly with libraries, they can contain classes from different namespaces and/or different libraries can contain classes from the same namespace.
David Rodríguez - dribeas
- 204,818
- 23
- 294
- 489
8
The closest to Java packages are namespaces in C++.
They can be nested into one another, and you need to specifically declare that you are using them or a part of their contents. However, they do not enforce any physical file hierarchy like Java packages do.
Péter Török
- 114,404
- 31
- 268
- 329
3
Strictly speaking I think that namespaces in C++ provide the same semantics.
Mihai Toader
- 12,041
- 1
- 29
- 33
1
I guess it is more related to namespaces in C++. Java and C++ both use libraries. Library can be any independent set of classes[probably a framework] which can be accessed in our code.
aNish
- 1,079
- 6
- 11
0
External Libraries are there in both Java and C++. Just the formats vary, .jar in Java and .dll/.so in C++.
Purpose of Packages and Namespaces are different from Libraries. They avoid running out of names by allowing user to logically group the source.
Sulla
- 7,631
- 9
- 45
- 71
0
A package in Java is a namespace for classes, interfaces and enums. Package name, a dot and the classname form the fully qualified classname of a class:
com.example.hello.HelloWorldApplication
^--packagename--^ ^-----classname-----^
The dots in the package name have a different meaning then the dot between the names: the first two dots of this example are part of the package name, the last one is a separator.
This should be kept in mind, because there's a common misunderstanding regarding package names: just because the names can be mapped to a hierarchical folder structure, some people think, package names have a hierarchy too - which is not the case: hello is not a "subpackage" of example!
But, to create a simple mapping to folders and files, a classloader can simply take the fully qualified class name, replace all dots with a slash and append .class to get a relative path to a class file.
But note again, that a folder/file mapping is not required t load classes - we can invent a class loader that gets classes from a database or a remote service - a folder/file mapping wouldn't make any sense in that case.
Andreas Dolk
- 113,398
- 19
- 180
- 268