I tested a couple of variants (for bigint only) with built-in functionality and this variant with OVERLAY() turned out fastest in my local tests on Postgres 11:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION varbit2bigint2(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT OVERLAY(bit(64) '0' PLACING b FROM 65 - bit_length(b))::bigint
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
Other candidates:
Note the different conversion of empty bitstrings ('') to 0 vs. NULL. Adapt to your needs!
Your function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION varbit2bigint1(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT CASE bit_length($1)
WHEN 1 THEN $1::bit(1)::bigint
WHEN 2 THEN $1::bit(2)::bigint
WHEN 3 THEN $1::bit(3)::bigint
WHEN 4 THEN $1::bit(4)::bigint
WHEN 5 THEN $1::bit(5)::bigint
WHEN 6 THEN $1::bit(6)::bigint
WHEN 7 THEN $1::bit(7)::bigint
WHEN 8 THEN $1::bit(8)::bigint
WHEN 9 THEN $1::bit(9)::bigint
WHEN 10 THEN $1::bit(10)::bigint
WHEN 11 THEN $1::bit(11)::bigint
WHEN 12 THEN $1::bit(12)::bigint
WHEN 13 THEN $1::bit(13)::bigint
WHEN 14 THEN $1::bit(14)::bigint
WHEN 15 THEN $1::bit(15)::bigint
WHEN 16 THEN $1::bit(16)::bigint
WHEN 17 THEN $1::bit(17)::bigint
WHEN 18 THEN $1::bit(18)::bigint
WHEN 19 THEN $1::bit(19)::bigint
WHEN 20 THEN $1::bit(20)::bigint
WHEN 21 THEN $1::bit(21)::bigint
WHEN 22 THEN $1::bit(22)::bigint
WHEN 23 THEN $1::bit(23)::bigint
WHEN 24 THEN $1::bit(24)::bigint
WHEN 25 THEN $1::bit(25)::bigint
WHEN 26 THEN $1::bit(26)::bigint
WHEN 27 THEN $1::bit(27)::bigint
WHEN 28 THEN $1::bit(28)::bigint
WHEN 29 THEN $1::bit(29)::bigint
WHEN 30 THEN $1::bit(30)::bigint
WHEN 31 THEN $1::bit(31)::bigint
WHEN 32 THEN $1::bit(32)::bigint
WHEN 33 THEN $1::bit(33)::bigint
WHEN 34 THEN $1::bit(34)::bigint
WHEN 35 THEN $1::bit(35)::bigint
WHEN 36 THEN $1::bit(36)::bigint
WHEN 37 THEN $1::bit(37)::bigint
WHEN 38 THEN $1::bit(38)::bigint
WHEN 39 THEN $1::bit(39)::bigint
WHEN 40 THEN $1::bit(40)::bigint
WHEN 41 THEN $1::bit(41)::bigint
WHEN 42 THEN $1::bit(42)::bigint
WHEN 43 THEN $1::bit(43)::bigint
WHEN 44 THEN $1::bit(44)::bigint
WHEN 45 THEN $1::bit(45)::bigint
WHEN 46 THEN $1::bit(46)::bigint
WHEN 47 THEN $1::bit(47)::bigint
WHEN 48 THEN $1::bit(48)::bigint
WHEN 49 THEN $1::bit(49)::bigint
WHEN 50 THEN $1::bit(50)::bigint
WHEN 51 THEN $1::bit(51)::bigint
WHEN 52 THEN $1::bit(52)::bigint
WHEN 53 THEN $1::bit(53)::bigint
WHEN 54 THEN $1::bit(54)::bigint
WHEN 55 THEN $1::bit(55)::bigint
WHEN 56 THEN $1::bit(56)::bigint
WHEN 57 THEN $1::bit(57)::bigint
WHEN 58 THEN $1::bit(58)::bigint
WHEN 59 THEN $1::bit(59)::bigint
WHEN 60 THEN $1::bit(60)::bigint
WHEN 61 THEN $1::bit(61)::bigint
WHEN 62 THEN $1::bit(62)::bigint
WHEN 63 THEN $1::bit(63)::bigint
WHEN 64 THEN $1::bit(64)::bigint
ELSE NULL::bigint
END
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE; -- no STRICT modifier
Left-padding the text representation with '0':
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_temp.varbit2bigint3(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT lpad(b::text, 64, '0')::bit(64)::bigint
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
Bit-shifting before the cast:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION varbit2bigint4(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT (bit(64) '0' || b << bit_length(b))::bit(64)::bigint
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
db<>fiddle here
Related:
Your feedback
It is not worst, it is faster!
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select
varbit_to_bigint(osm_id::bit(64)::varbit)
from planet_osm_point limit 10000 ;
-- Planning time: 0.697 ms
-- Execution time: 1133.571 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select
lpad(osm_id::bit(64)::varbit::text, 32, '0')::bit(64)::bigint
from planet_osm_point limit 10000;
-- Planning time: 0.105 ms
-- Execution time: 26.429 ms
You show a STRICT modifier with the bigint variant of the function in the question (not sure why it differs from the integer variant). If that represents the function you actually tested, I expect most of the observed performance difference is due to that added STRICT modifier preventing function inlining. Quoting the Postgres Wiki:
if the function is declared STRICT, then the planner must be able to
prove that the body expression necessarily returns NULL if any
parameter is null. At present, this condition is only satisfied if:
every parameter is referenced at least once, and all functions,
operators and other constructs used in the body are themselves STRICT.
That seems to hurt your function badly - while my winner seems unaffected, and the other two variants are even ~ 10 % faster. Same fiddle with STRICT functions:
db<>fiddle here
Related:
I suggest you re-test with and without STRICT modifier to see for yourself.