I am trying to generate a URI for fetching delta records from ServiceNow API. While executing my program, I create a filter and concatenate the same with the original uri and by using get method of RestAssured, I extract the results. Although the above steps are working for full extract but somehow when I try to generate a URI with filter conditions, I am getting an illegal character error.
I have written the following function, for getting the data from API:-
public static void getURIIncrementalExtract(String tblName, String params) {
        RestAssured.baseURI = null;
        String params = ""; //For stackoverflow
        String displayValueParam = "sysparm_display_value=true&";
        String dateParams = "";
        dateParams = "sysparm_query=col_updated_on>=2017-09-30"; //+     fromDate
        String uri = "https://[servicenowAPIadd].com/api/now/table/" +     tblName + "?" + displayValueParam + params + dateParams;
        System.out.println(uri); //URI generated is working correctly in     postman.
        RestAssured.baseURI = uri;
    }
//The uri generated by above function //https://[servicenowAPIadd].com/api/now/table/[DBtablename]?sysparm_display_value=true&sysparm_query=col_updated_on>=2017-09-30
public static Response getResponseByPath() {
        Response response = null;
        try {
            response = RestAssured.given()
                    .when()
                    .auth()
                    .basic(username, password)
                    .get(RestAssured.baseURI);
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
            log.error("Exception in getResponseByPath:-" + e.toString());
        }
        return response;
    }    
In the main method, I call the getURIIncrementalExtract followed by getResponseByPath.
I am getting an illegal syntax exception whenever I try to add the sysparm_query filters. If I remove the filter i.e. "sysparm_query=col_updated_on>=2017-09-30", it works fine.
I am expecting to generate and use the URI for filtered data as well. I think the way I am generating the URI can be wrong. Can someone share a right approach please. Please let me know if further information is required.
 
    