Problem: Sometimes you will want to access a component from javascript with
getElementById, but id's are generated dynamically in JSF, so you
need a method of getting an objects id.  I answer below on how you can do this.
Original Question: I want to use some code like below. How can I reference the inputText JSF component in my Javascript?
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
      xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
      xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core">
    <head>
       <title>Input Name Page</title>
        <script type="javascript" >
          function myFunc() {
            // how can I get the contents of the inputText component below          
            alert("Your email address is: " + document.getElementById("emailAddress").value);
          }
       </script>
    </head>
    <h:body>
        <f:view>
            <h:form>
                Please enter your email address:<br/>
                <h:inputText id="emailAddresses" value="#{emailAddresses.emailAddressesStr}"/>
                <h:commandButton onclick="myFunc()" action="results" value="Next"/>
            </h:form>
        </f:view>
    </h:body>
</html>
Update: this post Client Identifiers in JSF2.0 discusses using a technique like:
<script type="javascript" >
  function myFunc() {
    alert("Your email address is: " + document.getElementById("#{myInptTxtId.clientId}").value);
  }
</script>
<h:inputText id="myInptTxtId" value="backingBean.emailAddress"/>
<h:commandButton onclick="myFunc()" action="results" value="Next"/>
Suggesting that the attribute id on the inputText component
creates an object that can be accessed with EL using #{myInptTxtId},
in the above example.  The article goes on to state that JSF 2.0 adds
the zero-argument getClientId() method to the UIComponent class.
Thereby allowing the #{myInptTxtId.clientId} construct suggested
above to get the actual generated id of the component.
Though in my tests this doesn't work. Can anyone else confirm/deny. The answers suggested below suffer from drawback that the above technique doesn't. So it would be good to know if the above technique actually works.
 
     
     
     
     
     
    