I am trying to combine multiple plots but I don't want to write a ton of code, so I wrote a function
MYGRAPH.Leaf<-function(i){
  ggplot(Leaf.hemi, aes(x=type, y=i, group=pot))+
    geom_line(color="grey")+
    geom_point(aes(color=host))+
    #geom_text_repel()+
    facet_wrap(.~hemiparasite)+
    ylab(names(leaf.response.hemi[i]))+
    newtheme
}
graphs<-lapply(leaf.response.hemi, MYGRAPH.Leaf)
ggarrange(graphs$K, graphs$Na, graphs$P, graphs$Ca, graphs$S, graphs$Mg, common.legend=TRUE
Here is some of the code of Leaf.hemi
head(Leaf.hemi)
   X.1  X        K     Na         P        Mg        Ca         S
6    6  6 4.298202 0.0018 0.9763679 0.4000289 1.2009743 0.7394368
8    8  8 3.490799 0.0030 0.9442089 0.4924891 1.3988981 0.9508996
9    9  9 2.215777 0.0037 0.8185966 0.6482371 1.8348983 1.2879451
11  11 11 4.647563 0.0012 0.7674694 0.3947354 0.9526773 0.7056782
13  13 13 3.457349 0.0054 0.6979817 0.5680050 1.3992462 1.2307497
14  14 14 2.603297 0.0008 0.6273514 0.5238602 1.4479887 1.2073244
   hemiparasite pot.code type host pot mesh.size leaf.species
6          CAFO      41B    B ACMI  41        35         CAFO
8          CAFO      42B    B ACMI  42        35         CAFO
9          CAFO      42C    C ACMI  42        35         CAFO
11         CAFO      43B    B ACMI  43        35         CAFO
13         CAFO      44B    B ACMI  44        35         CAFO
14         CAFO      44C    C ACMI  44        35         CAFO
with leaf.response.hemi just being the 6 response variables
        K     Na         P        Mg         S        Ca
6  4.298202 0.0018 0.9763679 0.4000289 0.7394368 1.2009743
8  3.490799 0.0030 0.9442089 0.4924891 0.9508996 1.3988981
9  2.215777 0.0037 0.8185966 0.6482371 1.2879451 1.8348983
11 4.647563 0.0012 0.7674694 0.3947354 0.7056782 0.9526773
13 3.457349 0.0054 0.6979817 0.5680050 1.2307497 1.3992462
14 2.603297 0.0008 0.6273514 0.5238602 1.2073244 1.4479887
Basically, it all works great, except when I create the graphs, despite the actual points being correct ,the y-label is off
Any help would be appreciated, it is so much better to do it this way (or any other way someone might suggest)

