Once you know what's the order of the keys (alpha ?), you can use this:
let dict: [String: [Int]] = ["a": [1,2], "b": [3, 4], "c": [5, 6]]
let keys = dict.keys.sorted() //Or do whatever you want here to get your target order
var matrix: [[String]] = []
keys.forEach {
guard let arrayAsInt = dict[$0] else { return }
let arrayAsString = arrayAsInt.map{ "\($0)" }
matrix.append( [$0] + arrayAsString)
}
print("Matrix: \(matrix)")
let transposed = matrix.transposed()
print("Transposed Matrix: \(transposed)")
let output = transposed.map { $0.joined(separator: ",")}.joined(separator: "\n")
print(output)
The outputs:
$>Matrix: [["a", "1", "2"], ["b", "3", "4"], ["c", "5", "6"]]
$>Transposed Matrix: [["a", "b", "c"], ["1", "3", "5"], ["2", "4", "6"]]
$>a,b,c
1,3,5
2,4,6
Obvisouly the "\n" might be invisible and be an actual new line
a,b,c
1,3,5
2,4,6
Being
a,b,c\n1,3,5\n2,4,6
What's the idea behind that? Create a matrix and use the transpose (it's used in maths with matrix, it's one of the basic modification of a matrix).
First transform the [String: [Int]] into a [[String]], where each element would be key followed by its values. I transformed it there as String for simpler code later.
Why doing that? Because the matrix value is easy to get from your initial dict. the transposed value is harder (not impossible) to get from dict but easier from matrix, and the transposed is quickly transformed into your format.
So my thinking was the reverse:
Get a structure from your output, then how to get it, it's a transpose, so I need to get the initial input as it, etc.
With the help of a code for Transpose Matrix (that accept String elements).
extension Collection where Self.Iterator.Element: RandomAccessCollection {
// PRECONDITION: `self` must be rectangular, i.e. every row has equal size.
func transposed() -> [[Self.Iterator.Element.Iterator.Element]] {
guard let firstRow = self.first else { return [] }
return firstRow.indices.map { index in
self.map{ $0[index] }
}
}
}
Any code (there a various) working ones, should the trick. I took it from here.
As pointed by @Leo Dabus, you can remove the Self.Iterator.Element
from the extension code (twice). I just wanted to it as such, not modifying the initial answer since it's not mind.