Here is a summary function which will use the the sum of Sens + Spec as selection metric:
youdenSumary <- function(data, lev = NULL, model = NULL){
  if (length(lev) > 2) {
    stop(paste("Your outcome has", length(lev), "levels. The joudenSumary() function isn't appropriate."))
  }
  if (!all(levels(data[, "pred"]) == lev)) {
    stop("levels of observed and predicted data do not match")
  }
  Sens <- caret::sensitivity(data[, "pred"], data[, "obs"], lev[1]) 
  Spec <- caret::specificity(data[, "pred"], data[, "obs"], lev[2])
  j <- Sens + Spec
  out <- c(j, Spec, Sens)
  names(out) <- c("j", "Spec", "Sens")
 out
}
To understand why it is defined as such please read this chapter from the caret book. Some answers that might be helpful here on SO are:
Custom Performance Function in caret Package using predicted Probability
Additional metrics in caret - PPV, sensitivity, specificity
Example:
library(caret)
library(mlbench)
data(Sonar)
fitControl <- trainControl(method = "cv",
                           number = 5,
                           summaryFunction = youdenSumary)
fit <-  train(Class ~.,
              data = Sonar,
              method = "rpart", 
              metric = "j" ,
              tuneLength = 5,
              trControl = fitControl)
fit
#output
CART 
208 samples
 60 predictor
  2 classes: 'M', 'R' 
No pre-processing
Resampling: Cross-Validated (5 fold) 
Summary of sample sizes: 167, 166, 166, 166, 167 
Resampling results across tuning parameters:
  cp          j         Spec       Sens     
  0.00000000  1.394980  0.6100000  0.7849802
  0.01030928  1.394980  0.6100000  0.7849802
  0.05154639  1.387708  0.6300000  0.7577075
  0.06701031  1.398629  0.6405263  0.7581028
  0.48453608  1.215457  0.3684211  0.8470356
j was used to select the optimal model using the largest value.
The final value used for the model was cp = 0.06701031.