Is there any case (testing or whatever etc...) or usefulness to have a folder containing python files without the __init__.py file?
i.e:
   project/
           run.py
           package1/
                   file1.py
                   file2.py
instead of:
   project/
           run.py
           package1/
                    __init__.py
                    file1.py
                    file2.py
I ask this because I have seen some projects with folders (that contain python files) with and without the __init__.py file so I was wondering if there is a reason for this to happen. I also have seen some people complaining about Pylance in Visual Code Studio missing importing own modules but adding the __init__.py file in the folder containing the module seems to solve that issue (in case you have this issue try this ;) ).
From this thread Is __init__.py not required for packages in Python 3.3+ and other sources I have seen that there are namespace packages in python that do not have the __init__.py file. However if I am not mistaken this only applies when you are creating a folder containing ONLY another folder a not python files.
So from all this my take away message for good practices when doing a python project is:
- add a __init__.pyfile to all folders containing python files
- folders that only contain a folder(s) and no python files should not have the __init__.py(this is a namespace package)
- folders that only contain images or other no-python files/documents should not have the __init__.py
Is this correct?
 
    