I'd be interested to know if it would be faster to invert the sequencing and the casting as.Date:
# My function getDays
getDays_1 <- function(year) {
  d1 <- as.Date(paste(year, '-01-01', sep = ''));
  d2 <- as.Date(paste(year, '-12-31', sep = ''));
  as.Date(d1:d2, origin = '1970-01-01');
};
# other getDays
getDays_2 <- function(year) {      
  seq(as.Date(paste(year, '-01-01', sep='')), 
      as.Date(paste(year, '-12-31', sep='')), 
      by = '+1 day');
};
test_getDays_1 <- function(n = 10000) {
  for(i in 1:n) {
    getDays_1(2000);
  };
};
test_getDays_2 <- function(n = 10000) {
  for(i in 1:n) {
    getDays_2(2000);
  };
};
system.time(test_getDays_1());
# user  system elapsed 
# 4.80    0.00    4.81 
system.time(test_getDays_2());
# user  system elapsed 
# 4.52    0.00    4.53 
I guess not . . . it appears that sequencing Date objects is slightly faster than convert a vector of integers to Dates