I ran into this same issue when transitioning from Elasticsearch 6 to OpenSearch. In Elasticsearch I was accustomed to index templates being additive. For example, in Elasticsearch 6, I could do something like this:
Create an index template to configure ILM rollover alias
PUT _template/a_descriptive_template_name-ilm
{
    "settings": {
        "index.lifecycle.name": "an_efficient_ilm_policy",
        "index.lifecycle.rollover_alias": "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm"
    },
    "order": 10,
    "index_patterns": [
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm-*"
    ]
}
Create an index template to configure index shard settings
PUT _template/a_common_template_name
{
    "settings": {
        "number_of_shards": 2,
        "number_of_replicas": 1
    },
    "order": 5,
    "index_patterns": [
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm-*"
    ]
}
Create the initial index
PUT a_descriptive_index_name-ilm-000001
{
    "aliases": {
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm": {
            "is_write_index": true
        }
    }
}
Verify the settings
GET a_descriptive_index_name-ilm-000001
{
  "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm-000001" : {
    "aliases" : {
      "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm" : {
        "is_write_index" : true
      }
    },
    "mappings" : { },
    "settings" : {
      "index" : {
        "lifecycle" : {
          "name" : "an_efficient_ilm_policy",
          "rollover_alias" : "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm"
        },
        "number_of_shards" : "2",
        "provided_name" : "a_descriptive_index_name-ilm-000001",
        "creation_date" : "1692853100041",
        "number_of_replicas" : "1",
        "uuid" : "AJ3OiRaXRj2cVCvuKlUWgg",
        "version" : {
          "created" : "6081299"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
When I tried to do this same technique in Opensearch 2.3, I noticed that it did not work as I expected. The template with the higher priority overwrote the settings in the lower priority template, completely, even if there were not overlapping settings. In the example below, where I am doing the same thing as Elasticsearch (but using different verbs for OpenSearch), you will see that the additive behavior is no longer supported:
Create an index template to configure ISM rollover alias
PUT _index_template/a_descriptive_template_name-ism
{
    "template": {
        "settings": {
            "plugins.index_state_management.rollover_alias": "a_descriptive_index_name-ism"
        }
    },
    "priority": 10,
    "index_patterns": [
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-*"
    ]
}
Create an index template to configure index shard settings
PUT _index_template/a_common_template_name
{
    "template": {
        "settings": {
          "number_of_shards": 2,
          "number_of_replicas": 1
        }
    },
    "priority": 5,
    "index_patterns": [
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-*"
    ]
}
Create the initial index
PUT a_descriptive_index_name-ism-000001
{
    "aliases": {
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ism": {
            "is_write_index": true
        }
    }
}
Verify the settings
{
  "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-000001" : {
    "aliases" : {
      "a_descriptive_index_name-ism" : {
        "is_write_index" : true
      }
    },
    "mappings" : { },
    "settings" : {
      "index" : {
        "number_of_shards" : "1",
        "plugins" : {
          "index_state_management" : {
            "rollover_alias" : "a_descriptive_index_name-ism"
          }
        },
        "provided_name" : "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-000001",
        "creation_date" : "1692853523944",
        "number_of_replicas" : "1",
        "uuid" : "ZZSjabAVQACC7m8Xn0uKtA",
        "version" : {
          "created" : "136247827"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}
As you can see, the "number_of_shards": 2 setting gets overwritten.
To apply both the shard settings and the ISM rollover settings, (and whatever other settings / mappings required), there are two options.
- Combine all the settings / mappings and ISM configuration into a single index template (or single index template per index pattern)
 
- [Better Solution] Use the OpenSearch Composable index templates functionality to allow for "layering" templates.
 
The OP answered in a later comment "It does, I have another index template". To solve for this scenario, option 2 is the way I suggest to follow.
Here is an example:
Create a component template to configure index shard settings
PUT _component_template/shards_component_template
{
      "template": {
        "settings": {
          "number_of_shards": 2,
          "number_of_replicas": 1
        }
    }
}
Create the index template to configure ILM rollover alias, referencing the component template
PUT _index_template/a_descriptive_template_name-ism
{
    "template": {
        "settings": {
            "plugins.index_state_management.rollover_alias": "a_descriptive_index_name-ism"
        }
    },
    "priority": 10,
    "index_patterns": [
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-*"
    ],
    "composed_of": [
        "shards_component_template"
    ]
}
Create the initial index
PUT a_descriptive_index_name-ism-000001
{
    "aliases": {
        "a_descriptive_index_name-ism": {
            "is_write_index": true
        }
    }
}
Verify the settings
{
  "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-000001" : {
    "aliases" : {
      "a_descriptive_index_name-ism" : {
        "is_write_index" : true
      }
    },
    "mappings" : { },
    "settings" : {
      "index" : {
        "number_of_shards" : "2",
        "plugins" : {
          "index_state_management" : {
            "rollover_alias" : "a_descriptive_index_name-ism"
          }
        },
        "provided_name" : "a_descriptive_index_name-ism-000001",
        "creation_date" : "1692854275856",
        "number_of_replicas" : "1",
        "uuid" : "SGvVILFsSG-3PdpoCg8Tkw",
        "version" : {
          "created" : "136247827"
        }
      }
    }
  }
}