I'm looking for standard way to do this..
This post here explores 3 ways. Here to.  Which way should you use for a generic case...is it a matter of preference.
For example if I use the instantiation way..than I have two lines of code instead of one...I have to instanitate the object...and than call the method...
If I use a static type implementation than I don't have to instantiate any objects.
The 3rd option the module pattern...is more costly b.c. it is self-executing.
If I had to name them:
- object - non static
- object - static
- module pattern
Which way is suggested in general so I don't have to debate this each time I begin to consolidate methods.
Here is an example of collected methods I would like to consolidate.
/********************
group:checks
********************/
var patterns = 
  {
  name: /^[a-zA-Z-\s]{1,20}$/,
  email: /^[a-zA-Z0-9._(-)]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.(-)]+\.[a-zA-Z]{1,4}$/,
  pass: /.{6,40}/,
  url:  /^[(-)\w&:\/\.=\?,#+]{1,}$/,
  aml:  /<(.+)_([a-z]){1}>$/
  };
/*
- check_generic() - generic 
*/
function check_generic(reg_ex_in,text,html_id,response)
  {
  if(!reg_ex_in.exec(text.value))
    {
    fill_id(html_id,response);
    return 0;
    }
  return 1;
  }
/*
- check_empty() - checks for empty text 
*/
function check_empty(text,html_id,response) 
  {
  for(var a=0;a<text.length;a++)
    {
    if(text[a].value==='')
      {
      fill_id(html_id,response);
      return 0;
      }
    }
  return 1;
  }
/*
- check_same() - checks if two text entries are the same 
*/
function check_same(text1,text2,html_id,response)
  {
  if((text1.value)!==(text2.value))
    {
    fill_id(html_id,response);return 0;
    }
  fill_id(html_id,'');
  return 1;
  }
 
    