'ObjectContext' vs 'DbContext' in Entity Framework

Question

I'm using the DbContext class within code that I am creating that is based on the Generic Repositories and Unit of Work design patterns. (I am following the guidance here.) While working on this project I have encountered the ObjectContext class.

I've read quite a number of posts that discuss ObjectContext vs. DbContext. While some of what I've read makes sense, I still don't have a complete understanding of the differences and this leaves me wondering about my current implementation. Should I be using DbContext, ObjectContext or both? Is using one of these now considered an anti-pattern?

possible duplicate of [Is DbContext the same as DataContext?](http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3471455/is-dbcontext-the-same-as-datacontext) — bytebender, Jun 14 '12 at 00:19

score 24 · Accepted Answer · edited Aug 18 '17 at 17:29

24

DbContext is just a wrapper around ObjectContext.

DbContext is just a set of APIs that are easier to use than the APIs exposed by ObjectContext.

Anyway, here you'll find a very simple Visual Studio template that uses the Repository Pattern and the Entity Framework.

edited Aug 18 '17 at 17:29

DavidRR

18,291
25
109
191

answered Feb 07 '12 at 13:22

Massimiliano Peluso

26,379
6
61
70

2

check this [article](http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/UploadFile/ff2f08/objectcontext-vs-dbcontext/) for more – Shaiju T Oct 16 '15 at 15:44

score -1 · Answer 2 · answered Mar 25 '15 at 20:57

From ObjectContext VS DBContext.

Dbcontext can be defined as a lightweight version of the ObjectContext or we can say Dbcontext is a wrapper of ObjectContext and exposes only the common features that are really required in programming. We can also get a reference to the ObjectContext from then DbContext to use those features that are only supported in ObjectContext.

The following code could help to get an ObjectContext Object from an existing DbContext Object.

public class EntityDBContext: DbContext, IObjectContextAdapter
{
   ObjectContext IObjectContextAdapter.ObjectContext
   {
        get
        {
              var objectContext = (this as IObjectContextAdapter)
              if(objectContext != null)
                return (this as IObjectContextAdapter).ObjectContext;
              else
                return null;
        }
   }
}

Finally, DbContext is not a replacement of ObjectContext, but it is a simple alternative that builds on ObjectContext.

this one throws StackOwerflowException. See https://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ms182153.aspx — Jan Muncinsky, Sep 20 '17 at 08:41

score -2 · Answer 3 · answered Dec 12 '12 at 13:48

We can cast a DBContext to type ObjectContext

public class MyContext: DbContext
{
    public DbSet<Blog> Blogs { get; set; }
   //other dbsets, ctor etc.

    public ObjectContext ObjectContext()
    {
        return (this as IObjectContextAdapter).ObjectContext;
    }
}

'ObjectContext' vs 'DbContext' in Entity Framework

3 Answers3

Linked

Related