It says it implements IEnumerable because it implements IEnumerable. 
IEnumerable<T> inherits IEnumerable, but it can obviously provide no implementation. Classes that implement IEnumerable<T> must also implement IEnumerable, whether or not they explicitly state that they do so. 
class Foo : IEnumerable<T> 
class Foo : IEnumerable<T>, IEnumerable
With either case, you implement the members of both interfaces. The second class definition simply makes it obvious for those looking at the class and/or the documentation, which is a good thing. An inexperienced or otherwise uninformed reader might not know that IEnumerable<T> brings IEnumerable along with it. They might might not know that a class that implements IEnumerable<T> can be used where an IEnumerable is expected. This simply provides a bit more information to the reader, which can only be a good thing on average.