3

I'm setting up a new dev and file share server for myself in the closet from my old desktop. I've been running Debian as long as I can remember and have nothing to blaim. Now I'm looking at ZFS and feeling really intrigued by it's features.

What do you thing, Debian or Opensolaris on my next home server?

My vision is to have some kind of small backup for files in the network (80GB perhaps) and some dev setup. Apache, some Java servers, SQL database, DHCP and perhaps some monitoring. Nothing really critical, just for fun and to keep myself busy.

Some HW specs:

AMD Athlon XP 2400+
1GB RAM
80GB + 160GB HDD (IDE)
Nvidia 7600 Graphics (yeah, not needed I know.)

Hennes
  • 65,804
  • 7
  • 115
  • 169
Jonas G
  • 295

3 Answers3

2

If you're interested in ZFS, then you might want to try FreeBSD. The software selection is better than OpenSolaris.

Iain
  • 4,786
2

Wait for Opensolaris 2010.04 to be released. You'll have the deduplication feature available, a more advanced OS than Solaris 10 (next Solaris release will be based on OpenSolaris) and an environment less disruptive than Solaris 10 as you are coming from Gnu/Linux. If you can't wait, just use the dev build 132, which is the latest 2010.04 beta. Although adding RAM definitely won't hurt, your system should work fast enough as a server. Disable the graphic environment when you don't need it.

jlliagre
  • 14,369
0

As an FYI, you could also run Solaris 10, which also supports ZFS, and is a bit less "bleeding-edge" than OpenSolaris.

The biggest thing that I see here is that (Open)Solaris(10) requires a lot more hardware to run smoothly than Linux. With the specs that you list, performance will not be very good. If you add more RAM (4GB+ total), you should see an increase in performance, and a faster, multi-core processor would also be a benefit.

So, in this case I would choose Debian over Solaris.

Iain
  • 4,786
Joe Internet
  • 5,355