I'll preface this by saying that I'm fairly new to using LDAP and really have no formal training with it.
Pretty much exactly what the topic title says. Is there any real reason that surname is a required attribute for inetOrgPerson entries in LDAP, and cn is not the only required thing? Would it break anything if some dummy value was inserted into it, or if a part of a username was used?
Reason I'm asking - we're (an online community I'm an administrator in) is looking into using LDAP (ApacheDS) and RADIUS as a central authentication and user management point for all of our web utilities, servers, e-mail, etc. We're just a for fun community, and most people don't feel comfortable with giving out their last names (which is understandable).
Right now, members of our community that would have a need to be in the ldap server use the general naming schema of [tag][nickname], where [tag] varies based on position/rank in the community. Is it alright to just use the [nickname] field for a surname value? I don't see why it wouldn't be... my only thing is that it just kinda looks weird saying surname when it's not an actual surname.