I was just curious about what are those available partition table types in gparted useful for. Is there any reason to use them instead of MBR or GPT ?
- atari
- aix
- amiga
- bsd
- dvh
- mac
- pc98
- sun
I was just curious about what are those available partition table types in gparted useful for. Is there any reason to use them instead of MBR or GPT ?
gparted useful for?The options you mention (other than Atari) are covered below (and I guess Atari is there to support Atari partition tables).
The options correspond to the various partitioning systems supported in
libparted; there's not much documentation, but looking at the source code:
aixprovides support for the volumes used in IBM’s AIX (which introduced what we now know as LVM);amigaprovides support for the Amiga’s RDB partitioning scheme;bsdprovides support for BSD disk labels;dvhprovides support for SGI disk volume headers;gptprovides support for GUID partition tables;macprovides support for old (pre-GPT) Apple partition tables;msdosprovides support for DOS-style MBR partition tables;pc98provides support for PC-98 partition tables;sunprovides support for Sun’s partitioning scheme;loopprovides support for raw disk access (loopback-style) — I’m not sure about the uses for this one.As you can see, the majority of these are for older systems, and you probably won’t need to create a partition table of any type other than
gptormsdos.For a new disk, I recommend
gpt: it allows more partitions, it can be booted even in pre-UEFI systems (usinggrub), and supports disks larger than 2 TiB (up to 8 ZiB for 512-byte sector disks). Actually, if you don’t need to boot from the disk, I’d recommend not using a partitioning scheme at all and simply adding the whole disk tomdadm, LVM, or a zpool, depending on whether you use LVM (on top ofmdadmor not) or ZFS.
Source What are the differences between the various partition tables?, answer by Stephen Kitt