1

I run a RAID10 machine with 4x Samsung 480GB SSD's. The drives are of identical age.

3 of the drives have a Wear_Leveling_Count 090, but one is now as low as 003. I don't understand why one of the drives is so much worse than the other 3. Their load and usage is identical. All drives were new when they were first installed 2 years ago.

The RAW value of the failing drive is 3058.

That said, the performance is still fine. Should this drive be replaced ASAP or can I ignore it? Replacing the drive means a lot of downtime for my sites.

Raw output of smartctl can be found here: https://pastebin.com/ktdEGFqS

smartctl -a /dev/sdd
smartctl 7.0 2018-12-30 r4883 [x86_64-linux-3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64] (local build)
Copyright (C) 2002-18, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org

=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Samsung based SSDs Device Model: SAMSUNG MZ7GE480HMHP-00003 Serial Number: S1M8NYAF700916 LU WWN Device Id: 5 002538 800184545 Firmware Version: EXT0303Q User Capacity: 480,103,981,056 bytes [480 GB] Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical Rotation Rate: Solid State Device Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: ACS-2, ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4c SATA Version is: SATA 3.1, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s) Local Time is: Sat Aug 5 10:04:25 2023 CEST SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled

=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA. See vendor-specific Attribute list for failed Attributes.

General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity was never started. Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled. Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run. Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 0) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities: (0x53) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. No Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. No Conveyance Self-test supported. Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. General Purpose Logging supported. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 110) minutes. SCT capabilities: (0x003d) SCT Status supported. SCT Error Recovery Control supported. SCT Feature Control supported. SCT Data Table supported.

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 1 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 085 085 000 Old_age Always - 74986 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 16 177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 003 003 005 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 3058 179 Used_Rsvd_Blk_Cnt_Tot 0x0013 100 100 010 Pre-fail Always - 0 180 Unused_Rsvd_Blk_Cnt_Tot 0x0013 100 100 010 Pre-fail Always - 8796 181 Program_Fail_Cnt_Total 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 182 Erase_Fail_Count_Total 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 183 Runtime_Bad_Block 0x0013 100 100 010 Pre-fail Always - 0 184 End-to-End_Error 0x0033 100 100 097 Pre-fail Always - 0 187 Uncorrectable_Error_Cnt 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0032 067 043 000 Old_age Always - 33 195 ECC_Error_Rate 0x001a 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 199 CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 202 Exception_Mode_Status 0x0033 100 100 010 Pre-fail Always - 0 235 POR_Recovery_Count 0x0012 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 12 241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 2711366975590

SMART Error Log Version: 1 No Errors Logged

SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error

1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 1 -

2 Short offline Completed without error 00% 0 -

3 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 5 -

4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 0 -

5 Short offline Completed without error 00% 432 -

6 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 412 -

7 Short offline Completed without error 00% 408 -

8 Short offline Completed without error 00% 384 -

9 Short offline Completed without error 00% 360 -

#10 Short offline Completed without error 00% 336 - #11 Short offline Completed without error 00% 312 - #12 Short offline Completed without error 00% 288 - #13 Short offline Completed without error 00% 264 - #14 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 245 - #15 Short offline Completed without error 00% 240 - #16 Short offline Completed without error 00% 216 - #17 Short offline Completed without error 00% 192 - #18 Short offline Completed without error 00% 168 - #19 Short offline Completed without error 00% 144 -

SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS 1 0 0 Not_testing 2 0 0 Not_testing 3 0 0 Not_testing 4 0 0 Not_testing 5 0 0 Not_testing Selective self-test flags (0x0): After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay.

Mr.Boon
  • 519

1 Answers1

-1

Your smartctl output says :

ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
177 Wear_Leveling_Count 0x0013 003 003 005 Pre-fail Always FAILING_NOW 3058

I truly dislike the FAILING_NOW flag.

Note also this horrifying warning in the output :

SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED!
Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA.

Although this disk is the same age as the other disks, it might have been weaker to start with when you bought them. Disk quality and endurance is just a matter of luck.

I think you should listen to the warning and replace this disk.

harrymc
  • 498,455