2

I know most of the network latency for short distances is due to router processing times. But for longer distances the speed of light also counts. And it's different from the speed the light in the vacuum. What is it?

Hennes
  • 65,804
  • 7
  • 115
  • 169
Jader Dias
  • 16,236

3 Answers3

7

A typical index of refraction for optical fiber is 1.62, therefore the speed of light in a fiber is approximately 3e8 m/s / 1.62 = 1.85e8 m/s. Therefore it would take at least 1000000 m /1.85e8 m/s = 0.0054 s to travel that distance. Note that this value doesn't cover the extra distance traveled by the light from bouncing side to side.

2

Distance Delay is simply the minimum amount of time that it takes the electrical signals that represent bits to travel down the physical wire. Optical cable sends bits at about ~5.5 µs/km, copper cable sends it at ~5.606 µs/km, and satellite sends bits at ~3.3 µs/km. (There are a few additional microseconds of delay from amplifying repeaters in optical cable, but compared to distance, the delay is negligible.)

source: http://www.networkperformancedaily.com/2008/06/latency_and_jitter_1.html

Jader Dias
  • 16,236
1

The general conception of the speed of light in vacuum is 300,000 km/s, give or take. That is 300 km/ms or around 1,000 km in 3.3 ms (milliseconds). The minimum network latency for a 1000 km connection using optic fibers may be between 10 and 30 milliseconds, according to the answer of @kyle kanos to the question "How fast does light travel through a fibre optic cable?", in the Physics Stack Exchange.

freethinker36
  • 119
  • 1
  • 1
  • 6