8

I was contemplating purchasing a QNAP 459-II for my home storage/streaming needs and a friend advised me that I should look into ZFS rather. I read up a bit on the filing system technology and was overwhelmed by the sheer volume of information I found. It honestly was too much for me to take in to base a decision on, which is why I ask here - relying on your feedback and experiences. Here is my desired usage scenario:

  • 2TB to 4TB over the next 2 years
  • File types: music, video, photos, Office Documents, PDFs, and general files downloaded from the internet
  • Would like to stream media files across all devices in home (have an 802.11n router with mostly 802.11n compliant devices)
  • Use as a backup point for files from 2 laptops
  • Would like to work with documents (eg. MS Word files) off the network - don't know if that's advisable

From what I've read ZFS requires a lot of juice (max Ram + server CPU preferably) to work optimally and requires some hectic shell-type configurations. I'm not deeply technical (but always willing to learn something new), so something like a QNAP for me where I just have to plug in my drives and probably go thru some initial setup wizard is the easiest.

Is sound technical knowledge required to get a ZFS system working right and more importantly, maintain? What are the pro's and cons of either a ZFS or QNAP-like setup?

bad_coder
  • 649
maGz
  • 201
  • 1
  • 3
  • 8

1 Answers1

9

I wrote a blog article for Super User about my ZFS-based NAS, which I built about a year ago. I'd strongly recommend ZFS - the article summarises the main benefits for a NAS, and here's a good detailed description of ZFS's features (see the show notes, and from about 28 minutes into the video).

I get satisfactory performance with a 2008 dual-core Atom CPU, and 2 GB of memory. And obviously it's far cheaper than the pre-made devices from QNAP, Drobo, Netgear, etc.

FreeNAS's web interface does make setting-up and managing the NAS fairly straightforward, although there is still some ZFS lingo to get used to. Other than the learning curve, the main disadvantage of ZFS is that it can be awkward or impossible to add a new hard drive to an existing storage pool, while maintaining the redundancy of RAID-Z.

What has changed since I wrote the blog article is that "FreeNAS 0.7" now has the unfortunate name NAS4free, and what used to be called "FreeNAS 8" is still called FreeNAS 8. It'd still recommend NAS4free, because of the lower recommended hardware requirements and better features, such as the Transmission BitTorrent client. NAS4free also has a newer version of ZFS: v28 rather than v15 in FreeNAS 8. This adds deduplication (although this needs lots of memory!), among other features.

Community
  • 1
sblair
  • 12,757