28

If I open Vim and type itest<Esc>:wq then I get a file that has no newlines in Vim but does seem to have a newline in the code:

$ vim -u NONE test.txt
$ cat test.txt | hd
00000000  74 65 73 74 0a                    |test.|
00000005

If I open Vim and type itest<Return><Esc>:wq then I get a file that has one newline in Vim but two newlines in the code:

$ rm test.txt
$ vim -u NONE test.txt
$ cat test.txt | hd
00000000  74 65 73 74 0a 0a                 |test..|
00000006

Note that I am opening Vim with -u NONE so there is no local configuration being used. Note also that this might be related to a previous question of mine.

This is my system info:

$ uname -a
Linux awsAlpha 3.2.0-60-virtual #91-Ubuntu SMP Wed Feb 19 04:13:28 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ vim --version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled May  4 2012 04:25:35)
Included patches: 1-429
Modified by pkg-vim-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Compiled by buildd@

I can confirm the exact same behaviour on this system as well:

$ uname -a
Linux bruno 3.5.0-48-generic #72-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 10 23:18:29 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ vim --version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Oct 26 2012 16:45:33)
Included patches: 1-547
Modified by pkg-vim-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Compiled by buildd@

Why is Vim adding a newline? Is this a convention?

Here is some clarification about the hd command as installed on Ubuntu Server:

$ man hd | head -4
HEXDUMP(1)            BSD General Commands Manual            HEXDUMP(1)

NAME
     hexdump, hd — ASCII, decimal, hexadecimal, octal dump
dotancohen
  • 11,720

5 Answers5

33

The convention for Unix text files is that every line is terminated by a newline, and that newlines are line terminators, not line separators.

When Vim saves a buffer as a file, it terminates every line with the end-of-line sequence for that file format, which for Unix is a newline. See

:help 'fileformat'

If you're using Unix text-processing tools, it's best to stick with this convention. However, if you have some need to not put a newline at the end of the last line of a file, you can do so. Vim considers such files to be "binary". See

:help 'binary'
:help edit-binary
garyjohn
  • 36,494
6

Vim 8.0 now provides for this with the fixeol option. Specifically if you do:

:set nofixeol

then Vim won't add a trailing newline character at the end of the final line if the file didn't already have one.

That could go in a filetype plugin, or possibly even your .vimrc.

(This is an improvement on :set binary because it only affects the final line-break character, whereas binary also changes a bunch of other behaviours, which you probably don't want unless you're actually editing a binary file.)

A newly created file will still have a trailing line-break character by default. You can change that (and switch a file that already has a final newline to not having one) by additionally doing:

:set noeol

That has to be set specifically for each file you wish to change: loading a file into a buffer will always set eol to match the file's current state.

Smylers
  • 334
2

Vim is not adding anything that you didn't put there yourself.

A "newline" character is not a "new line" and both examples are perfectly normal:

  • in the first one, the file only contains one line so you get one "newline" character,
  • in the second one, the file contains two lines so you get two "newline" characters.
romainl
  • 23,415
2

Unterminated text files are evil for multiple reasons; here's one that I haven't seen mentioned yet:

In a hypothetical world where text files without a trailing newline are acceptable, there would be no difference between a file containing 0 lines and a file containing 1 blank line. They'd both be represented by a 0-byte file.

Inability to decide how many lines are in a file would be bad.

1

Using the 'j' command you can join all the lines into one.

If you also want to remove the LF or CRLF on the last line do the following in vi.

$ vi file
:set binary
:set noeol
:w!
:f          look for [noeol] on the status line
:q
Robert
  • 11