खश

Sanskrit

Etymology

The name is of uncertain origin, partly because accounts disagree on where the tribe originated. In the Mahāmāyūrī text, they are placed somewhere between Bactria and Kapisi (modern Afghanistan), suggesting an Iranian origin; while other inner-Indian texts describe them as aborigines/barbarians from the Himalayas.[1]

Pronunciation

Proper noun

खश • (khaśa) stemm

  1. northern tribe living in the Punjab region between Āraṭṭa and Vasāti
    • c. 400 BCE, Mahābhārata
      • प्रस्थला मद्रगन्धार आरट्ट नामतः खशाः वसाति षिन्धुसौवीरा
        prasthalā madragandhāra āraṭṭa nāmataḥ khaśāḥ vasāti ṣindhusauvīrā
  2. descendants of outcast Kshatriyas who adopted Vaishnavism

Declension

Masculine a-stem declension of खश
singular dual plural
nominative खशः (khaśaḥ) खशौ (khaśau)
खशा¹ (khaśā¹)
खशाः (khaśāḥ)
खशासः¹ (khaśāsaḥ¹)
accusative खशम् (khaśam) खशौ (khaśau)
खशा¹ (khaśā¹)
खशान् (khaśān)
instrumental खशेन (khaśena) खशाभ्याम् (khaśābhyām) खशैः (khaśaiḥ)
खशेभिः¹ (khaśebhiḥ¹)
dative खशाय (khaśāya) खशाभ्याम् (khaśābhyām) खशेभ्यः (khaśebhyaḥ)
ablative खशात् (khaśāt) खशाभ्याम् (khaśābhyām) खशेभ्यः (khaśebhyaḥ)
genitive खशस्य (khaśasya) खशयोः (khaśayoḥ) खशानाम् (khaśānām)
locative खशे (khaśe) खशयोः (khaśayoḥ) खशेषु (khaśeṣu)
vocative खश (khaśa) खशौ (khaśau)
खशा¹ (khaśā¹)
खशाः (khaśāḥ)
खशासः¹ (khaśāsaḥ¹)
  • ¹Vedic

Descendants

  • Dardic:
    • Kashmiri: khāh
      Arabic script: کھاہ
      Devanagari script: खाह
  • Prakrit: 𑀔𑀲 (khasa)
    • Northern:
      • Khasa Prakrit:
        • Central Pahari:
          • Kumaoni: खस (khas), खसिया (khasiyā)
        • Eastern Pahari:
        • Western Pahari:
          • Bhadrawahi: खश (khaś), खाशा (khāśā)
          • Dogri: खस (khas)
            • Dogri: खस्साली (khassālī)
    • Northwestern:
      • Paisaci Prakrit:
        • Sindhi:
          • Jadgali: [script needed] (khauś)

References

  • Laxman S. Thakur (1990) K. K. Kusuman, editor, The Khasas An Early Indian Tribe[1], Mittal Publications, →ISBN, pages 285–293
  • Turner, Ralph Lilley (1969–1985) “khasa”, in A Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages, London: Oxford University Press, page 203
  1. ^ Indo-Scythian Studies: Being Khotanese Texts Volume VII. (1985). United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, p. 53-54