Reconstruction:Proto-Austroasiatic/muəjʔ

This Proto-Austroasiatic entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Austroasiatic

Etymology

  • Proto-Austroasiatic: *muəjʔ ~ *moːjʔ (Sidwell, 2024, #AA049)
  • Proto-Mon-Khmer: *muuj ~ *muəj (Shorto, 2006, #1495.A, B)

Proto-Aslian had alternate nasal onset. Vietic and Mang have stop codas that don't match with the rest. The Khasian lemmas (if indeed are reflexes of this root) show the loss of initial *m-.

Numeral

cardinal number
1 Previous: n/a
Next: *ɓaːr

*muəjʔ

  1. one

Descendants

  • Proto-Aslian: *[m/n]uay (Phillips, 2012)
    • Jah Hut: nwɛj
    • Jahaic:
      • Cheq Wong: nɑ̃y
      • Kensiu: naj
      • Jahai: nɛj
    • Senoic:
    • Semelaic:
      • Semaq Beri: muj
      • Semelai: muːj
  • Proto-Bahnaric: *muəj (Sidwell, 2011) (see there for further descendants)
  • Proto-Katuic: *muoj (Sidwell, 2005)
    • Katu:
      • Eastern Katu: mui
    • Western Katuic:
      • Eastern Bru: muoi
      • Kui: mṳːj
    • Ta'Oi-Pacoh:
  • Proto-Khasian: *wiː (Sidwell, 2018)
  • Khmeric:
  • Proto-Khmuic: *moːj (Sidwell, 2013)
  • Pakanic:
    • Mang: mak⁷
    • Bolyu: maːi³¹
  • Monic:
  • Munda:
  • Proto-Palaungic: *moːh (Sidwell, 2015)
    • Lamet: moːh
  • Pearic:
    • Chong:
      • Chantaburi: mo̤ːˀj
      • Kanchanaburi: mṳːˀj
    • Pear: muəj
  • Proto-Vietic: *moːc (Ferlus, 2007) (see there for further descendants)

See also

  • *ɗiiʔ ~ *ɗiis ~ *ɗuuʔ ~ *ɗuul

References

  • Shorto, Harry (2006) Sidwell, Paul, Doug Cooper and Christian Bauer, editors, A Mon-Khmer Comparative Dictionary, Canberra: Australian National University. Pacific Linguistics, →ISBN
  • Sidwell, Paul (2024) “500 Proto Austroasiatic Etyma: Version 1.0”, in Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society[1], volume 17, number 1, pages i–xxxiii