Reconstruction:Proto-Austronesian/Siwa
Proto-Austronesian
< 8 | 9 | 10 > |
---|---|---|
Cardinal : *Siwa | ||
Etymology
Any etymology beyond this reconstructed form is controversial. Sagart (2004) considers it to have arisen after Proto-Austronesian proper, rather than from a compound from *ɣatep (“five”) + *Səpat (“four”), and relates it to Kulon-Pazeh xasebisupat (literally “five and four”), but Winter (2010) rejects this on phonological and historical grounds.
- Consistency of sound changes p → w also ə and t sound dropped,
- "*ɣatepatəlu → *wa(tə)lu-"
- "*ɣatepiSəpat → wiS(ə)wa(t) → *wiSwa/*Siwa"
- except: ɣatepiduSa → pidu, because p meets d, so there is a sound reinforcement.
- Sagart (2014), pa → wa and pi still pi
- "*ɣatepituSa → *pitu"
- "*ɣatepatəlu → wa(tə)lu → *walu"
- "*ɣatepiSəpat → piS(ə)wa(t) → *piSwa/*Siwa"
Pronunciation
- IPA(key): /siwa/
Numeral
*Siwa
Descendants
- Proto-Malayo-Polynesian: *siwa
References
- Sagart, Laurent. 2004. "The higher phylogeny of Austronesian and the position of Tai-Kadai." Oceanic Linguistics 43, 2:411–444.
- Winter, Bodo. 2010. "A note on the higher phylogeny of Austronesian." Oceanic Linguistics 49, 1:282–287.