Reconstruction:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/jaŋ

This Proto-Sino-Tibetan entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Sino-Tibetan

Reconstruction

  • Proto-Sino-Tibetan: ?
    • Proto-Tibeto-Burman: *g-ya(k/ŋ) (Matisoff, STEDT)

The uvular/velar prefixes in rGyalrongic and Tibetan are traces of an animal prefix.[1]

Baxter and Sagart's reconstruction of a uvular in the Old Chinese descendant is rejected by Jacques and others; note that Bodish, rGyalrongic, and other non-Chinese cognates clearly show a *j initial.

STEDT attempts to equate Tibetan གཡག (g.yag, male yak), but according to Jacques, d'Alpoim Guedes, and Zhang (2021) the Tibetan term is genuinely cognate to only Tamangic *Bhjaː ("male yak").[2]

Noun

*jaŋ

  1. sheep

Descendants

  • Chinese: (OC /*laŋ/ (ZS), /*ɢaŋ/ (B-S), MC *yang, sheep, goat) (see there for further descendants)
  • Proto-Bodish: *(g)jaŋ
    • Tibetic
      • Tibetan: གཡང་དཀར་ (g.yang dkar), གཡང་མོ་ (g.yang mo)
    • Dakpa-Dzala
      • Dakpa: ཡེང (yeng)
      • Dzala: ཡེང (yeng)
    • East Bodish
      • Bumthangkha: ཡོ་གེ (yoge)
      • Khengkha: ཡོ (yo)
      • Kurtöp: ཡཱོ ()
  • rGyalrongic
    • West rGyalrongic
      • Horpa
        • Geshiza: ji
        • Tangut: 𗂽 (jij2)
      • Khroskyabs: ʁjê
    • East rGyalrongic
      • Japhug: qaʑo
      • Situ: kəɟók (Brag-bar), kəjō (Cogtse)
      • Zbu: qɐjɐ́ʔ
  • Naic
    • Proto-Naish: *jaɣ
      • Naxi: yuq
      • Narua: yo (/⁠jo˧⁠/)
      • Laze: [Term?] (/⁠y˧⁠/)
  • Lolo-Burmese
    • Burmish
      • Pela: jɔ̃⁵⁵ (goat)
    • Proto-Loloish: *ʒo¹ (sheep) (Bradley, 1979)
  • Ersuic: *jõ¹ (Yu, 2012)
    • Ersu: jo⁵⁵
    • Lizu: ȵo (Mianning), ȵu³⁵ (Kala)
  • Bai
    • Bai: yon (sheep)

References

  1. ^ Zhang, Shuya, Jacques, Guillaume, Lai, Yunfan (2019) “A study of cognates between Gyalrong languages and Old Chinese”, in Journal of Language Relationship, volume 17, number 1, →DOI, page 84 of 73–92
  2. ^ Jacques, Guillaume, d'Alpoim Guedes, Jade, Zhang, Shuya (2021) “Yak Domestication: A Review of Linguistic, Archaeological, and Genetic Evidence”, in Ethnobiology Letters, volume 12, number 1, →DOI, page 109 of 103-114