Reconstruction:Proto-Sino-Tibetan/mnam
Proto-Sino-Tibetan
Reconstruction
- Proto-Sino-Tibetan: *m-nəm (Schuessler, 2007)
- Proto-Tibeto-Burman: *m/s-nam (STEDT)
Traditionally reconstructed with a root *nam that is prefixed with *m- intransitively and *s- transitively. However, Jacques rejects this paradigm given that:[1]
- Jinghpaw does not actually use *s- to form its transitive "smell" verb; it instead uses a tone change from the *m- form. For Jacques, this indicates that the *m- is not prefixal, but rather root-initial.
- The verb appears in rGyalrongic with a root-initial cluster mn- onto which transitive prefixes were attached, including the *sɤ- causative prefix.
Jacques thus concludes that the root underlyingly began with an *mn-, with the initial *m suppressed when prefixed in Tibetan.
Verb
*mnam
Descendants
- Proto-Bodish: *(m)nam
- Tibetic
- Tibetan: མནམ (mnam), ⇒ སྣོམ (snom)
- Dakpa-Dzala
- Dakpa: [Term?] (/nem35/), [Term?] (/num35/)
- Tibetic
- rGyalrongic:
- rGyalrong:
- Japhug: mnɤm (“to emit a smell”), ⇒ nɤmnɤm (“to smell (something)”), ɕɤmnɤm (“to cause to have a smell”)
- rGyalrong:
- Naic
- Lolo-Burmese:
- Jinghpaw-Asakian:
- Jingpho: manam
- Tangkhulic: *nam
- Tangkhul Naga: khanganam
References
- ^ Jacques, Guillaume (2014) “On Coblin's Law”, in Richard VanNess Simmons, editor, Studies in Chinese and Sino-Tibetan Linguistics: Dialect, Phonology, Transcription and Text, Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica, pages 161-163