Reconstruction:Proto-Turkic/ȫrdek
Proto-Turkic
Etymology
A metathesized form, *ȫdrek, appears to have risen at an early date.
While usually considered simplex, there have been several proposals regarding its etymology:
- Nişanyan considers the possibility *ȫdrek might be the original form and puts forth a derivation from *öt- (“to chirp”), however he does elaborate on its morphology or phonology.
- Clauson suggests a derivation from *ȫr- (“to rise”) in reference to ducks rising out of the water, however there does not exist a suffix *-dek.
- EDAL reconstructs *Ebür(d)ek in order to connect it with Proto-Tungusic *ābu- (“a kind of duck”) and Japanese 鵜 (u, “cormorant”) under the disputed Altaic theory.
Noun
*ȫrdek
- (Common Turkic, ornithology) duck
- Synonym: *kuš (Siberian Turkic)
Declension
| singular 3) | |
|---|---|
| nominative | *ȫrdek |
| accusative | *ȫrdekig, *ȫrdekni1) |
| genitive | *ȫrdekniŋ |
| dative | *ȫrdekke |
| locative | *ȫrdekde |
| ablative | *ȫrdekden |
| allative | *ȫrdekgerü |
| instrumental 2) | *ȫrdekin |
| equative 2) | *ȫrdekče |
| similative 2) | *ȫrdekleyü |
| comitative 2) | *ȫrdekligü |
1) Originally used only in pronominal declension.
2) The original instrumental, equative, similative, and comitative cases have fallen into disuse in many modern Turkic languages.
3) Plurality in Proto-Turkic is disputed. See also the notes on the Proto-Turkic/Locative-ablative case and plurality page on Wikibooks.
2) The original instrumental, equative, similative, and comitative cases have fallen into disuse in many modern Turkic languages.
3) Plurality in Proto-Turkic is disputed. See also the notes on the Proto-Turkic/Locative-ablative case and plurality page on Wikibooks.
Descendants
References
- Clauson, Gerard (1972) “ördek”, in An Etymological Dictionary of pre-thirteenth-century Turkish, Oxford: Clarendon Press, →ISBN, →OCLC, page 205
- Nişanyan, Sevan (2002–) “ördek”, in Nişanyan Sözlük
- Starostin, Sergei, Dybo, Anna, Mudrak, Oleg (2003) Etymological dictionary of the Altaic languages (Handbuch der Orientalistik; VIII.8)[1], Leiden, New York, Köln: E.J. Brill