My professor tends to do the following to get a number from the user:
Scanner scanner = new Scanner(System.in);
Integer.parseInt(scanner.nextLine());
What are the benefits as opposed to simply doing scanner.nextInt() ?
java.util.Scanner.java has the following in it:
public int nextInt() {
    return nextInt(defaultRadix);
}
public int nextInt(int radix) {
    // Check cached result
    if ((typeCache != null) && (typeCache instanceof Integer)
        && this.radix == radix) {
        int val = ((Integer)typeCache).intValue();
        useTypeCache();
        return val;
    }
    setRadix(radix);
    clearCaches();
    // Search for next int
    try {
        String s = next(integerPattern());
        if (matcher.group(SIMPLE_GROUP_INDEX) == null)
            s = processIntegerToken(s);
        return Integer.parseInt(s, radix);
    } catch (NumberFormatException nfe) {
        position = matcher.start(); // don't skip bad token
        throw new InputMismatchException(nfe.getMessage());
    }
}
As I see it, Scanner calls Integer.parseInt() itself as well, on top of additional hocus pocus. Are there significant performance gains in doing simply Integer.parseInt(scanner.nextLine()) ? Are there on the other hand any drawbacks?
How about when scanning through a file with significant amount of data, and not a user input?
 
     
     
     
     
     
    