trinus

Latin

Latin numbers (edit)
30
 ←  2 III
3
4  → [a], [b]
    Cardinal: trēs
    Ordinal: tertius
    Adverbial: ter
    Proportional: triplus
    Multiplier: triplex
    Distributive: ternus, trīnus
    Collective: terniō
    Fractional: triēns

Etymology

From Proto-Italic *triznos, itself from Proto-Indo-European *trís (thrice) and the adjective-forming suffix *-nós (Latin -nus), equivalent to ter +‎ -nus; doublet of ternus.

Pronunciation

Numeral

trīnus (feminine trīna, neuter trīnum); first/second-declension numeral

  1. (in the plural) three each
  2. triple
  3. (in pluralibus tantum) three

Usage notes

This is part of the Latin series of distributive numerals. These numerals are inflected as first/second-declension adjectives; in Classical Latin, they typically accompany plural nouns (with which they agree in case and gender) and have the following functions:

  • to express the sense “[numeral] [noun]s each/apiece”, as in hominis digiti ternos articulos habent, “a man’s fingers have three joints each” (Pliny the Elder, Natural History 11.244.3).
  • to express multiplication after a numeral adverb,[1] as in Gallinaciis enim pullis bis deni dies opus sunt, pavoninis ter noveni "hens' [eggs] need twice ten days, peahens' thrice nine" (Marcus Terentius Varro, Res Rusticae 3.9.10)
  • to express the sense of cardinal numerals when used with pluralia tantum (plural-only nouns) such as castra "camp":[1] for example, "twelve camps" is expressed by duodēna castra (Pliny the Elder, Natural History 7.105.5). Distributive forms are regularly used in this context for the number 2 and for all numbers greater than 4. For 1, plural-only nouns are used with plural inflected forms of the cardinal ūnus (one), as in ūnae scālae "one flight of stairs" (rather than with forms of the distributive numeral singulus). For 3 and 4, plural-only nouns are used with the plural inflected forms of trīnus[2] and quadrīnus, as in trīna castra "three camps" (rather than with forms of ternus and quaternus, which tend to be used in distributive function[3]).

These adjectives do not normally occur in the singular.[4] However, some singular forms are attested in Classical Latin poetry,[1] possibly motivated by metrical considerations (e.g. corpore bīnō "twofold body" in Lucretius De Rerum Natura 5.879, and bīnus ... honor "double/twofold honor" in Ovid Epistulae ex Ponto 4.9.64). Singular forms are also attested in postclassical Latin, where these adjectives sometimes have non-distributive meanings (taking an ordinal, cardinal, or collective sense instead). These alternative senses are sometimes continued by Romance descendants (e.g. Spanish noveno (ninth) from Latin novēnus).

The genitive plural of singulus is usually singulōrum/singulārum, but distributive numerals greater than one commonly use short genitive plural forms ending in -um rather than the longer forms ending in -ōrum and -ārum.[4][2]

Declension

First/second-declension adjective.

singular plural
masculine feminine neuter masculine feminine neuter
nominative trīnus trīna trīnum trīnī trīnae trīna
genitive trīnī trīnae trīnī trīnum
trīnōrum
trīnum
trīnārum
trīnum
trīnōrum
dative trīnō trīnae trīnō trīnīs
accusative trīnum trīnam trīnum trīnōs trīnās trīna
ablative trīnō trīnā trīnō trīnīs
vocative trīne trīna trīnum trīnī trīnae trīna

Derived terms

Descendants

  • Italian: trino, trina
  • Middle French: trin
  • Sicilian: trinu
  • Vulgar Latin: *trēna

References

  • trīni”, in Charlton T. Lewis and Charles Short (1879) A Latin Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press
  • trīnī”, in Charlton T. Lewis (1891) An Elementary Latin Dictionary, New York: Harper & Brothers
  • trīni in Gaffiot, Félix (1934) Dictionnaire illustré latin-français, Hachette.
  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Henry John Roby (1876) A Grammar of the Latin Language from Plautus to Suetonius, volume 1, pages 443-444
  2. 2.0 2.1 J. P. Postgate (1907) “The so-called Distributives in Latin”, in The Classical Review, volume 21, number 7, page 201
  3. ^ S. E. Jackson (1909) “Indogermanic Numerals”, in The Classical Review, volume 23, number 7, page 164
  4. 4.0 4.1 Karl Gottlob Zumpt (1853) Leonhard Schmitz, Charles Anthon, transl., A Grammar of the Latin Language, 3rd edition, page 101