Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/bʰóh₁
Proto-Indo-European
Etymology
The Latin, Greek and Tocharian forms are often linked to *h₂m̥bʰi, but Dunkel thinks only the first element is related.[1]
Determiner
Inflection
| Thematic | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| masculine | feminine | ||
| nominative | *bʰóh₁ | *bʰéh₂h₁(e) | |
| genitive | *? | *? | |
| masculine | singular | dual | plural |
| nominative | — | *bʰóh₁ | — |
| vocative | — | *bʰóh₁ | — |
| accusative | — | *bʰóh₁ | — |
| genitive | — | *? | — |
| ablative | — | *? | — |
| dative | — | *? | — |
| locative | — | *? | — |
| instrumental | — | *? | — |
| feminine | singular | dual | plural |
| nominative | — | *bʰéh₂h₁(e) | — |
| vocative | — | *bʰéh₂h₁(e) | — |
| accusative | — | *bʰéh₂h₁(e) | — |
| genitive | — | *? | — |
| ablative | — | *? | — |
| dative | — | *? | — |
| locative | — | *? | — |
| instrumental | — | *? | — |
| neuter | singular | dual | plural |
| nominative | — | *bʰóy(h₁) | — |
| vocative | — | *bʰóy(h₁) | — |
| accusative | — | *bʰóy(h₁) | — |
| genitive | — | *? | — |
| ablative | — | *? | — |
| dative | — | *? | — |
| locative | — | *? | — |
| instrumental | — | *? | — |
Derived terms
- *h₂o-bʰóh₁[1] / *Ho-bʰóh₁[6]
- *h₂u-bʰóh₁[1][6]
- Proto-Indo-Iranian: *HubʰáH (see there for further descendants)
- *bʰó-yo-s (“on both sides, in both ways”)[1] (with the descendants adapting to their respective word without *-yo-suffix)
Descendants
- Proto-Germanic: *bai (see there for further descendants)
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 Dunkel, George E. (2014) “*bʰó- 'zwei zusammen, beide'”, in Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme [Lexicon of Indo-European Particles and Pronominal Stems] (in German), volume 2: Lexikon, Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, →ISBN, pages 124-127
- ^ Lundquist, Jesse, Yates, Anthony D. (2017–2018) “Chapter XX: Proto-Indo-European”, in Klein, Jared S., Joseph, Brian D., Fritz, Matthias, editors, Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics: An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science]; 41.2), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, →ISBN, § The morphology of Proto-Indo-European, page 2104: “*bʰo- 'both'”
- ^ Kroonen, Guus (2013) “*ba-”, in Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 11)[1], Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 46
- ^ Eugen Hill (2012) “Hidden sound laws in the inflectional morphology of Proto-Indo-European”, in The Sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European)[2], Museum Tusculum Press, page 184: “*h₂n̥tbʰóh₁ m., *-ói̯h₁ n.'both'”
- ^ De Vaan, Michiel (2008) “ambō”, in Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 7), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 37: “PIE h₂(e)nt-bʰoH 'both'”
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 Lubotsky, Alexander (2011) “ubhá-”, in The Indo-Aryan Inherited Lexicon (in progress) (Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Project), Leiden University, pages 520-521
- ^ Adams, Douglas Q. (2013) “antapi”, in A Dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and Greatly Enlarged (Leiden Studies in Indo-European; 10), Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi, →ISBN, page 15
- ^ Derksen, Rick (2015) “abu”, in Etymological Dictionary of the Baltic Inherited Lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series; 13), Leiden, Boston: Brill, →ISBN, page 43
- ^ Trubachyov, Oleg, editor (1999), “*oba, *obě, *oboji, *oboja, *oboje”, in Этимологический словарь славянских языков [Etymological dictionary of Slavic languages] (in Russian), numbers 26 (*novoukъ(jь) – *obgorditi), Moscow: Nauka, →ISBN, page 85