Reconstruction:Proto-Indo-European/-lós

This Proto-Indo-European entry contains reconstructed terms and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Indo-European

    Suffix

    *(Ø)-lós[1][2][3]

    1. Forms agent nouns from verbal roots.
    2. Forms diminutive nouns from noun stems.
    3. Forms adjectives with the sense “pertaining to …” (alternative form of *-rós)
      Synonyms: *-nós, *-rós, *-yós

    Inflection

    Thematic
    singular
    nominative *(Ø)-lós
    genitive *(Ø)-lósyo
    singular dual plural
    nominative *(Ø)-lós *(Ø)-lóh₁ *(Ø)-lóes
    vocative *(Ø)-lé *(Ø)-lóh₁ *(Ø)-lóes
    accusative *(Ø)-lóm *(Ø)-lóh₁ *(Ø)-lóms
    genitive *(Ø)-lósyo *? *(Ø)-lóHom
    ablative *(Ø)-léad *? *(Ø)-lómos, *(Ø)-lóbʰos
    dative *(Ø)-lóey *? *(Ø)-lómos, *(Ø)-lóbʰos
    locative *(Ø)-léy, *(Ø)-lóy *? *(Ø)-lóysu
    instrumental *(Ø)-lóh₁ *? *(Ø)-lṓys

    Derived terms

    • *-e-lós (also *-o-lós?)
      • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-elas, *-alas
      • Proto-Celtic: *-elos
      • Proto-Germanic: *-ilaz[note 2] (see there for further descendants)
      • Proto-Hellenic: *-elós
        • Ancient Greek: -ηλος (-ēlos), ? -ήλας (-ḗlas)
      • Proto-Italic: *-elos, *-olos
    • *-eh₁-lós
      • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-ēˀlas
      • >? Proto-Hellenic: *-ēlos
        • >? Ancient Greek: -ηλος (-ēlos), ? -ήλας (-ḗlas)
      • Proto-Italic: *-ēlos
    • *-eh₂-lós
      • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-āˀlas
        • Proto-Slavic: *-alъ
      • Proto-Celtic: *-ālos (see there for further descendants)
      • >? Proto-Hellenic: *-ālos
        • >? Ancient Greek: -ηλος (-ēlos), ? -ήλας (-ḗlas)
    • ? *-i-los (or perhaps originally thematicized from an old suffix *-yl̥)
    • ? *-u-los[note 3]
      • Proto-Albanian: *-ula
      • >? Proto-Germanic: *-ulaz (see there for further descendants)
      • >? Proto-Indo-Iranian: *-ulás, *-urás
        • Proto-Iranian: *-ulah, *-urah (diminutive suffix)
          • Proto-Iranian: *-urahakah
          • Kurdish:
            Central Kurdish: ـوول (-ûl)
            Northern Kurdish: -ûl
          • Classical Persian: ـوله (-ûla)
            Iranian Persian: ـوله (ûle)

    Descendants

    • Proto-Balto-Slavic: *-lás, *-las
      • Proto-Slavic: *-lъ (see there for further descendants)
    • Proto-Celtic: *-los
    • Proto-Germanic: *-laz
    • Proto-Hellenic: *-lós, *-los
      • Ancient Greek: -λός (-lós), -λος (-los)
    • Proto-Indo-Iranian: *-lás, *-las, *-rás, *-ras
      • Proto-Indo-Aryan: *-lás, *-las, *-rás, *-ras
      • Proto-Iranian: *láh, *-lah, *-ráh, *-rah
    • Proto-Italic: *-los
    • Proto-Tocharian: *-le
    Notes

    The variety of derived forms is usually explained as absorption of the stems from different noun types (o-, eh₂-, i- and u-stems) into the suffix, or as influence from verbal suffixes. Germanic *-a- ~ *-i- ~ *-u- alternation may simply result from a type of umlaut or varying reflexes of a schwa.

    1. 1.0 1.1 From the o-grade (possibly merged with *-ol-o-s), but may also reflect *-ulos. Latin -ulus can also be directly from *-elos. Slavic *-ъlъ can also be explained as from regressive hardening.
    2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 Can reflect either *-elós or *-ilos.
    3. ^ Contaminated by or merged with a separate suffix *-ul-o-s, thematicized from *-wl̥ in late PIE.

    References

    1. ^ Schrijver, Peter C. H. (1991) The reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals in Latin (Leiden studies in Indo-European; 2), Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, →ISBN, page 456
    2. ^ Sihler, Andrew L. (1995) New Comparative Grammar of Greek and Latin, Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, →ISBN, page 367
    3. ^ Brugmann, Karl with translators Conway, R. Seymour and Rouse, W. H. D. (1891) A Comparative Grammar of the Indo-Germanic Languages, 1st edition, volume II, part I, New York: B. Westermann & Co., § 76, page 198